Effect of remineralizing agents on surface roughness of demineralized enamel
Document Type : مقالههای پژوهشی
10.48305/v12i2.1197
Abstract
Introduction: Enamel surface roughness affects its visual properties, plaque retention, abrasion and bond strength. The aim of this study was to determine surface roughness of enamel lesions treated with Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphus Calcium Phosphate (CPP-ACP), fluoride and a combination of these two. Materials & Methods: In this experimental study, 24 sound bovine anterior teeth were mounted in acrylic resin after decoronation. Then the samples were demineralized and divided into 4 groups: treatment with CPP-ACP, CPP-ACPF and fluoride mouthwash, fluoride mouthwash and control. After treatment, the surface roughness of each group was determined. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, followed by Duncan post hoc tests (α = 0.05). Results: The surface roughness of the control group was significantly higher than that in other treatment groups (p value = 0.011). Conclusion: The results showed that treatment with all the three remineralizing agents significantly reduced surface roughness. Key words: CPP-ACP, Dental enamel, Fluorides, Surface properties, Tooth demineralization, Tooth remineralization.
(2016). Effect of remineralizing agents on surface roughness of demineralized enamel. Journal of Isfahan Dental School, 12(2), 165-174. doi: 10.48305/v12i2.1197
MLA
. "Effect of remineralizing agents on surface roughness of demineralized enamel", Journal of Isfahan Dental School, 12, 2, 2016, 165-174. doi: 10.48305/v12i2.1197
HARVARD
(2016). 'Effect of remineralizing agents on surface roughness of demineralized enamel', Journal of Isfahan Dental School, 12(2), pp. 165-174. doi: 10.48305/v12i2.1197
CHICAGO
, "Effect of remineralizing agents on surface roughness of demineralized enamel," Journal of Isfahan Dental School, 12 2 (2016): 165-174, doi: 10.48305/v12i2.1197
VANCOUVER
Effect of remineralizing agents on surface roughness of demineralized enamel. Journal of Isfahan Dental School, 2016; 12(2): 165-174. doi: 10.48305/v12i2.1197