Journal of Isfahan Dental School

Accuracy of three types of electronic apex locators using histological sections as gold standard

Document Type : مقاله‌های پژوهشی

Authors

1 Graduate, School of Dentistry, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

2 Oral and Dental Research Center, Department of Endodontics, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: One of the most important steps in root canal treatment is to determine the exact working length as an effective factor in the success of treatment. Various tools and methods have been introduced to determine the working length, including electronic apex locators. This study was undertaken to compare the accuracy of three electronic apex locators, Root ZX, Woodpecker and Coxo in determining the actual working length.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 30 maxillary central incisors meeting the inclusion criteria were selected and the working length of each tooth was determined by three electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Woodpecker and Coxo. After irrigating the root canals with 6% hypochlorite and 0.9% normal saline solutions, electronic measurements were performed using a #15 K-file in the range of 1±0.5 mm at the apical constriction according to the manufacturer's instructions. After abrading 4 mm of the root end, the actual working length was calculated under a microscope from the distance between the coronal reference point and the apical constriction. Data were analyzed with chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test, using SPSS 16 (α = 0.05).
Results: The accuracy rates of Root ZX, Woodpecker and Coxo apex locators were 76.7% and 100%, 90% and 100%, and 93.3% and 100% in the range of 1 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. No significant differences were found between the working lengths measured by three apex locators and the actual working lengths.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, none of the three apex locators exhibited accuracy of 100% exactly at the apical constriction. There were no statistically significant differences between the working lengths obtained by three apex locators and the actual working lengths.
Key words: Apical constriction, Electronic apex locator, Working length

1.Yazdizadeh M, Habibikia A, Mohagheghi SA, Basiri A, Abbasi S, Niroomand N, et al. Clinical Comparison of the accuracy of root canal length determination in permanent teeth by means of Root ZX electronic apex locator, tactile perception and conventional radiography. Jundishapur Sci Med J 2014; 13(2): 181-90. [In Persian].
2. Mandlik J, Shah N, Pawar K, Gupta P, Singh S, Shaik SA. An in vivo evaluation of different methods of working length determination. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14(4): 644-8.
3. Raghu KN, Daniel JG, Razvi S, Vinaychandra R, Kini A, Nandakishore KJ In vivo evaluation of the accuracy of working length determination using an electronic apex locater IPEX (NSK) on vital uninfected teeth and teeth with radiographic evidence of periapical lesions. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2014; 4(Suppl 3): S204-8.
4. Sharma MC, Arora V. Determination of working length of root canal. Med J Armed Forces India 2010; 66(3): 231-4.
5.Yildirim C, Aktan AM, Karataslioglu E, Aksoy F, Isman O, Culha E. Performance of the working length determination using cone beam computed tomography, radiography and electronic apex locator, in comparisons to actual length. Iranian Journal of Radiology 2017; 14(1): e13468.
6.Taneja S, Kumar M, Sharma SS, Gogia H. Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Three Electronic Apex Locators in Different Simulated Clinical Conditions-An invitro Study. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2017;7(3): 190-4.
7. Tamse A, Kaffe I, Fishel D. Zygomatic arch interference with correct radiographic diagnosis in maxillary molar endodontics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980; 50(6): 563-6.
8.Lin S, Winocur-Arias O, Slutzky-Goldberg I. [Electronic Apex Locator as a dental instrument]. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993) 2009; 26(2): 26-30, 46. [In Hebrew].
9.Fouad AF, Krell KV. An in vitro comparison of five root canal length measuring instruments. J Endod 1989; 15(12): 573-7.
10.Fouad AF, Krell KV, McKendry DJ, Koorbusch GF, Olson RA. A clinical evaluation of five electronic root canal length measuring instruments. J Endod 1990; 16(9): 446-9.
11.Mittal R, Singla MG, Sood A, Singla A. Comparative evaluation of working length determination by using conventional radiography, digital radiography and electronic apex locator. J Res Dent 2015; 3(3): 70-5.
12.Paredes L, Sebastian M. Eficacia de diferentes Localizadores Apicales de Quinta Generacion en la obtencion de la longitud de trabajo. Estudio In vitro: Quito: UCE; 2017.
13. Heo MS, Han DH, An BM, Huh KH, Yi WJ, Lee SS, et al. Effect of ambient light and bit depth of digital radiograph on observer performance in determination of endodontic file positioning. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105(2): 239-44.
14.Malueg LA, Wilcox LR, Johnson W. Examination of external apical root resorption with scanning electron microscopy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82(1): 89-93.
15.Kim E, Marmo M, Lee CY, Oh NS, Kim IK. An in vivo comparison of working length determination by only root-ZX apex locator versus combining root-ZX apex locator with radiographs using a new impression technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105(4): e79-83.
16.Huang L. An experimental study of the principle of electronic root canal measurement. Journal of Endodontics 1987; 13(2): 60-4.
17.Krajczar K, Marada G, Gyulai G, Toth V. Comparison of radiographic and electronical working length determination on palatal and mesio-buccal root canals of extracted upper molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106(2): e90-3.
18.Cianconi L, Angotti V, Felici R, Conte G, Mancini M. Accuracy of three electronic apex locators compared with digital radiography: an ex vivo study. J Endod 2010; 36(12): 2003-7.
19.Mancini M, Felici R, Conte G, Costantini M, Cianconi L. Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in anterior and posterior teeth: an ex vivo study. J Endod 2011; 37(5): 684-7.
20.Real DG, Davidowicz H, Moura-Netto C, Zenkner Cde L, Pagliarin CM, Barletta FB, et al. Accuracy of working length determination using 3 electronic apex locators and direct digital radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 111(3): e44-9.
21.Vieyra JP, Acosta J, Mondaca JM. Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and two electronic apex locators. Int Endod J 2010; 43(1): 16-20.
22.Pascon EA, Marrelli M, Congi O, Ciancio R, Miceli F, Versiani MA. An ex vivo comparison of working length determination by 3 electronic apex locators. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108(3): e147-51.
23.Bernardes RA, Duarte MA, Vasconcelos BC, Moraes IG, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, et al. Evaluation of precision of length determination with 3 electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator, and RomiAPEX D-30. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104(4): e91-4.
24.Ebrahim AK, Wadachi R, Suda H. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of five different electronic apex locators for determining the working length of endodontically retreated teeth. Aust Endod J 2007; 33(1): 7-12.
25.ElAyouti A, Kimionis I, Chu AL, Löst C. Determining the apical terminus of root‐end resected teeth using three modern apex locators: a comparative ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2005; 38(11): 827-33.
26.Dunlap CA, Remeikis NA, BeGole EA, Rauschenberger CR. An in vivo evaluation of an electronic apex locator that uses the ratio method in vital and necrotic canals. J Endod 1998; 24(1): 48-50.
27.Welk AR, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. An in vivo comparison of two frequency-based electronic apex locators. J Endod 2003; 29(8): 497-500.
Journal of Isfahan Dental School
Volume 15, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
May 2019
Pages 218-225