Peri-Implant Health in Patients Referring to Periodontics Department of Yazd Dental School from 2010-2016
Document Type : مقالههای پژوهشی
Authors
1 Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
2 Dentist, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
3 3Dentist, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
4 Dentist, Department of Oral Health & Community, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
10.48305/v0i0.1650
Abstract
Introduction:One of the most common problems after implant treatment is peri-implant disease. Recognizing the prevalence of peri-implant disease has a significant role in reducing unwanted complications after implant placement. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of peri-implant disease in patient referring to periodontics department of Yazd Dental School.
Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, for patients who have been placed the implant in the periodontics department of dental school in the period of six years, clinical examination and patient records done. Finally, the data were analyzed by SPSS 18 software and Chi-square statistical test.
Results: In this study there was a significant relationship between healthy group and peri-implantitis in the terms of gender (p value = 0.047).but there is no significant relationship between age groups (p value = 0.385). There is a significant relationship between systemic disease (p value = 0.071), probing depth (p value = 0.0001), presence of keratinized mucosa (p value = 0.001) and smoking (p value = 0.036) with peri-implantitis. This relationship is not significant in the plaque index variable (p value = 0.229). There is significant relationship between implant type and peri-implantitis (p value = 0.030), but there is no significant correlation for implant location (0.872), prosthesis type (0.678), implant method (0.367).
There is direct relationship between the date of implant placement (p value = 0.01, rs = 0.229) and implant diameter (p value = 0.927, rs = 0.08) with peri-implantitis and inverse relationship between implant length (p value = 0.296, rs = 0.046) and peri-implantitis, which is statistically significant only in date of implant placement variable.
Conclusion: Based on our data, prevalence of peri-implantitis in patients referred to periodontics department was 84.9%. Statistically significant relationship was shown between gender, systemic disease, probing depth, keratinized mucosa, smoking, implant type, bridge and date of implant placement and peri-implantitis.
Keywords: Peri-implantitis, Dental implants, Smoking
Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, for patients who have been placed the implant in the periodontics department of dental school in the period of six years, clinical examination and patient records done. Finally, the data were analyzed by SPSS 18 software and Chi-square statistical test.
Results: In this study there was a significant relationship between healthy group and peri-implantitis in the terms of gender (p value = 0.047).but there is no significant relationship between age groups (p value = 0.385). There is a significant relationship between systemic disease (p value = 0.071), probing depth (p value = 0.0001), presence of keratinized mucosa (p value = 0.001) and smoking (p value = 0.036) with peri-implantitis. This relationship is not significant in the plaque index variable (p value = 0.229). There is significant relationship between implant type and peri-implantitis (p value = 0.030), but there is no significant correlation for implant location (0.872), prosthesis type (0.678), implant method (0.367).
There is direct relationship between the date of implant placement (p value = 0.01, rs = 0.229) and implant diameter (p value = 0.927, rs = 0.08) with peri-implantitis and inverse relationship between implant length (p value = 0.296, rs = 0.046) and peri-implantitis, which is statistically significant only in date of implant placement variable.
Conclusion: Based on our data, prevalence of peri-implantitis in patients referred to periodontics department was 84.9%. Statistically significant relationship was shown between gender, systemic disease, probing depth, keratinized mucosa, smoking, implant type, bridge and date of implant placement and peri-implantitis.
Keywords: Peri-implantitis, Dental implants, Smoking
1. Davies SJ, Gray RM, McCord JF. Good occlusal practice in removable prosthodontics. Br Dent J 2001; 191(9): 491-4, 497-502.
2. Fiske J, Davis D, Frances C, Gelbier S. The emotional effects of tooth loss in edentulous people. Br Dent J 1998; 184(2): 90-3.
3. Wang TF, Chen YY, Liou YM, Chou C. Investigating tooth loss and associated factors among older Taiwanese adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2014;58(3):446-53.
4. Lechner SK, Champion H, Tong TK. Complete denture problem solving: a survey. Aust Dent J 1995; 40(6): 377-80.
5. Derks J, Hakansson J, Wennstrom JL, Tomasi C, Larsson M, Berglundh T. Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a Swedish population: early and late implant loss. J Dent Res 2015; 94(3 Suppl): 44s-51s.
6. Swierkot K, Lottholz P, Flores-de-Jacoby L, Mengel R. Mucositis. peri-implantitis, implant success, and survival of implants in patients with treated generalized aggressive periodontitis: 3-to 16-year results of a prospective long-term cohort study. J Periodontol 2012; 83(10): 1213-25.
7. Lindhe J, Meyle J. Peri‐implant diseases: consensus report of the sixth European workshop on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35(8 Suppl): 282-5.
8. Renvert S, Roos‐Jansåker AM, Claffey N. Non‐surgical treatment of peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis: a literature review. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35(s8): 305-15.
9. Lang NP, Berglundh T. Periimplant diseases: where are we now?--Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38(Suppl 11): 178-81.
10. Aloufi F, Bissada N, Ficara A, Faddoul F, Al‐Zahrani MS. Clinical assessment of peri‐implant tissues in patients with varying severity of chronic periodontitis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11(1): 37-40.
11. Ferreira S, Silva G, Cortelli J, Costa J, Costa F. Prevalence and risk variables for peri‐implant disease in Brazilian subjects. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33(12): 929-35.
12. Koldsland OC, Scheie AA, Aass AM. The association between selected risk indicators and severity of peri‐implantitis using mixed model analyses. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38(3): 285-92.
13. Charalampakis G, Leonhardt Å, Rabe P, Dahlen G. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of peri‐implantitis cases: a retrospective multicentre study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23(9): 1045-54.
14. Marrone A, Lasserre J, Bercy P, Brecx MC. Prevalence and risk factors for peri‐implant disease in Belgian adults. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24(8): 934-40.
15. Derks J, Tomasi C. Peri‐implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol 2015; 42(Suppl 16): S158-71.
16. Fransson C, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Berglundh T. Prevalence of subjects with progressive bone loss at implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16(4): 440-6.
17. Renvert S, Aghazadeh A, Hallström H, Persson GR. Factors related to peri‐implantitis - a retrospective study.Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25(4): 522-9.
18. Rokn A, Aslroosta H, Akbari S, Najafi H, Zayeri F, Hashemi K. Prevalence of peri-implantitis in patients not participating in well-designed supportive periodontaltreatments: a cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28(3): 314-9.
19. Daubert DM, Weinstein BF, Bordin S, Leroux BG, Flemmig TF. Prevalence and predictive factors for peri-implant disease and implant failure: a cross-sectional analysis. J Periodontol 2015; 86(3): 337-47.
20. Fransson C, Wennström J, Tomasi C, Berglundh T. Extent of peri‐implantitis‐associated bone loss. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36(4): 357-63.
21. Serino G, Ström C. Peri‐implantitis in partially edentulous patients: association with inadequate plaque control. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20(2): 169-74.
22. Rinke S, Ohl S, Ziebolz D, Lange K, Eickholz P. Prevalence of periimplant diseasein partially edentulous patients: a practice‐based cross‐sectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22(8): 826-33.
23. Ferreira SD, Silva GL, Cortelli JR, Costa JE, Costa FO. Prevalence and risk variables for peri-implant disease in Brazilian subjects. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33(12): 929-35.
24. Roos-Jansåker AM, Lindahl C, Renvert H, Renvert S. Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part I: implant loss and associations to various factors. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33(4): 283-9.
25. Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological andtechnical complications in Implant Dent reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29(Suppl 3):197-212.
)