Comparison of the Diagnostic Power of Diagnodent and Phosphor Plate Radiography to Detect Secondary Caries in Class II Cavities
Document Type : مقالههای پژوهشی
Authors
1 Department of Radiology, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Dentist, Tehran, Iran
10.48305/v0i0.1715
Abstract
Introduction: It is of utmost importance to achieve a non-invasive method to diagnose secondary caries next to amalgam restorations. In many cases, clinical examination alone does not allow an accurate diagnosis of recurrent and proximal caries; therefore, appropriate radiographs and Diagnodent are required. The use of Diagnodent (laser fluorescence) and intraoral digital x-ray radiography (PSP) is increasing instead of visual inspection and tactile examination. Given the discrepancies in the results of studies about Diagnodent and digital x-ray radiography (PSP) for the detection of secondary caries, this study aimed to compare the diagnostic power of Diagnodet and intraoral digital radiography to detect secondary caries in class II amalgam restorations.
Materials and Methods: In this diagnostic study, 40 healthy human premolar teeth were used. First, 40 class II cavities were prepared and restored with amalgam. In the first stage, the teeth underwent radiography with an intraoral PSP system and saved. The teeth were then immersed in 0.1 mol lactic acid (pH = 4) to simulate recurrent caries for three weeks. Diagnodent was used in the clinical diagnosis to detect recurrent caries. In the final stage, teeth with recurrent caries underwent digital radiography. Finally, two oral and maxillofacial radiologists evaluated all the 80 radiographs. T-test was used to analyze the false-positive (FP) and false-negative (FN) results of the two techniques with SPSS 16 (α = 0.05).
Results: The study was carried out on 40 teeth using Diagnodent and intraoral PSP radiography. Incorrect diagnoses (FP and FN) were recorded in 28.5% and 21.2% of the cases with digital radiography and Diagnodent techniques, respectively (p value = 0.3).
Conclusion: Diagnodent and intraoral digital radiography exhibited similar diagnostic power in the detection of secondary caries around class II amalgam restorations.
Keywords: Diagnodent, Digital intraoral phosphore systems, Secondary caries
Materials and Methods: In this diagnostic study, 40 healthy human premolar teeth were used. First, 40 class II cavities were prepared and restored with amalgam. In the first stage, the teeth underwent radiography with an intraoral PSP system and saved. The teeth were then immersed in 0.1 mol lactic acid (pH = 4) to simulate recurrent caries for three weeks. Diagnodent was used in the clinical diagnosis to detect recurrent caries. In the final stage, teeth with recurrent caries underwent digital radiography. Finally, two oral and maxillofacial radiologists evaluated all the 80 radiographs. T-test was used to analyze the false-positive (FP) and false-negative (FN) results of the two techniques with SPSS 16 (α = 0.05).
Results: The study was carried out on 40 teeth using Diagnodent and intraoral PSP radiography. Incorrect diagnoses (FP and FN) were recorded in 28.5% and 21.2% of the cases with digital radiography and Diagnodent techniques, respectively (p value = 0.3).
Conclusion: Diagnodent and intraoral digital radiography exhibited similar diagnostic power in the detection of secondary caries around class II amalgam restorations.
Keywords: Diagnodent, Digital intraoral phosphore systems, Secondary caries
1. Nedeljkovic I, de Munck J, Vanloy A, Declerck D, Lambrechts P, Peumans M, et al. Secondary caries: prevalence, characteristics, and approach. Clinical Oral Investigations 2020; 24(2): 683-91.
2. Schwendicke F, Brouwer F, Paris S, Stolpe M. Detecting proximal secondary caries lesions: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Journal of Dental Research 2016; 95(2): 152-9.
3. Jokstad A. Secondary caries and microleakage. Dental Materials 2016; 32(1): 11-25.
4. Brouwer F, Askar H, Paris S, Schwendicke F. Detecting secondary caries lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research 2016; 95(2): 143-51.
5.Hewlett ER, Atchiso KA, White SC, Flack V. Radiographic secondary caries prevalence in teeth with clinically defective restorations. J Dent Res 1993; 72(12): 1604-8.
6. Sridhar N, Tandon S, Nirmala R. A comparative evaluation of DIAGNOdent with visual and radiography for detection of occlusal caries: An in vitro study. Indian J of Dental Research 2009; 20(3): 326-31.
7. Bamzahim M, Shi XQ, Angmar-Mansson B. Secondary caries detection by DIAGNOdent and radiography: a comparative in vitro study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 2004; 62(1): 61-4.
8.Bader JD, Shugars DA, Bonito AJ. A systematic review of the performance of methods for identifying carious lesions. J Public Health Dent 2002; 62(4): 201-13.
9. Chu CH, Lo ECM, You DSH. Clinical diagnosis of fissure caries with conventional and laser-indused fluorescence techniques. Lasers Med Sci 2009; 25(3): 355-62.
10. Costa AM, de Paula LM, Bezerra AC. Use of diagnodent for diagnosis of non-cavitated occlusal dentin caries. Journal of Applied Oral Science: Revista FOB 2008; 16(1): 18-23.
11. Goel.A, Chawla HS, Gauba K, Goyal A. Comparison of validity of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries in primary molars using the histological gold standard. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry 2009; 27(4): 227-34.
12. Braga MM, Chiarotti APS, Imparato JCP, Mendes FM. Validity and reliability of methods for the detection of secondary caries around amalgam restorations in primary teeth. Braz Oral Res 2010; 24(1): 102-7.
13. Sheehy EC, Brailsford SR, Kidd EAM, Beighton D, Zoitopoulos L. Comparison between visual examination and laser fluorescence system for in vivo diagnosis of occlusal caries. Caries Res 2001; 35(6): 421-6.
14. Reis A, Zach JV Jr, de Lima AC, de Lima Navarro MF, Grande RH. Occlusal caries detection: a comparison of DIAGNOdent and two conventional diagnostic methods. J Clin Dent 2004; 15(3): 76-82.
)