Journal of Isfahan Dental School

Effect of Splinting on the Accuracy Dental Implant Impression with Impression Materials C-Silicon and A-Silicon

Document Type : مقاله‌های پژوهشی

Authors

1 Dentist, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

3 Postgraduate Student, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Various symptoms have been attributed to tooth eruption. Further, parents use different strategies to reduce or eliminate these symptoms. This study was aimed to evaluate parental information about eruption of primary teeth in Isfahan, Iran. 
Materials and Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional survey was conducted on 100 parents having six-month- to three-year-old children referring to the dental clinics or offices in Isfahan. A questionnaire with validated face and content validity was designed to collect data. It included questions about demographic characteristics, eruption time and the first erupted tooth, symptoms of eruption, and control of symptoms. Data were analyzed by frequency distribution, relative frequency, descriptive indices, and chi-square test via SPSS 22.0. p value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.    
Results: The most frequent symptoms parents agreed with included high tendency to bite and chew, high saliva flow, and gingival inflammation, respectively. Fever was the most frequent symptom the majority of parents disagreed with. The most frequent methods used by the parents included hugging the child and amusing the child. The most frequent disagreement was reported for the use of sleeping drugs. No significant correlation between parental information about tooth eruption and economic status, parental education, parental age, and number of children was found. (p value < 0.05) The mean score of parental information was 2.37 ± 0.97 and degree of response was 96%.   
Conclusion: Parents’ knowledge about tooth eruption was moderate and acceptable awareness on symptoms of tooth eruption and methods of decreasing the symptoms was found.  
Keywords: Information, Eruption, Primary tooth, Parents

1- Brunski JB. Biomechanics of oral implants: Future research directions. J Dent Edc 1988; 52(12): 775-87.
2- Kan JY, Kungcharassaeng K, Bohsai K, Goodarce CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81(1): 7-13.
3- Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Alberktsson T, Rosen H. Tissue – integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1986; 77(3): 496-7.
4- Zarb GA, Schimit A. The Longitudinal clinical effectiveness of asseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part II. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64(1): 53-61.
5- Jemt T, Book K. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11(5): 620-5.
6- Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. In vitro comparison of master cast accuracy for singletooth implant replacement. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83(5): 562-6.
7- Jemt T, Rubenstein JE, Carlsson L, Lang BR. Measuring fit at the implant prosthodontic interface. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75(3): 314-25.
8- Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a five implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6(4): 448-55.
9- Kwon JH, Son YH, Han CH, KimS. Accuracy of implant impressions without impression copings: A threedimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2011; 105(6): 367-73.
10- Linkevicius T, Svediene O, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 108(4): 238-43.
11- Naert I, van Steenberghe D, Schepers E, Calberson L, Theuniers G, Ghyselen J, et al. The cumulative failure rate of the BrånemarkTM system in the overdenture, the fixed partial and the fixed full prostheses design: A prospective study on 1273 fixtures. J Head Neck Pathol 1991; 10: 43-53.
12- Sakaguchi RL, Ferracane JL, Powers JM. Craig's restorative dental materials. 14th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2019.
13- Shillinburg HT, Sather DA. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodotnics. 4th ed. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 2012.
14- Sadr SJ, Naser Khaki M. Evaluation of sodium hypochlorite on dimensional stability of silicone materials [Thesis]. Tehran, Iran: Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences; 1995. [In Persian].
15- Stackhouse JA Jr. The accuracy of stone dies made from rubber impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1970; 24(4): 377-86.
16- Wassell RW, Ibbetson RJ. The accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions made with standard and reinforced stock trays. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65(6): 748-57.
17- Perez-Davidi M, Levit M, Walter O, Eilat Y, Rosenfeld P. Clinical accuracy outcomes of splinted and nonsplinted implant impression methods in dental residency settings. Quintessence Int 2016; 47(10): 843-52.
18- Hariharan R, Shankar C, Rajan M, Baig MR, Azhagarasan NS. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25(1): 38-44.
19- Balshi TJ. An analysis and management of fractured implants: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11(5): 660-6.
20- Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics:current status. Implant Dent 2001; 10(2): 85-92.
21- Cho GC, Donovan TE, Chee WW, White SN. Tensile bone strength of polyvinyl siloxane impressions bonded to a custom tray as a function of drying time: part 1. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73(5): 419-23.
22- Ongül D, Gökçen-Röhlig B, Şermet B, Keskin H. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants. Aust Dent J 2012; 57(2): 184-9.
23- Rismanchian M, Monirifard R. Implant impression techniques: A review article. Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran 2008; 20(3): 234-42. [In Persian].
24- de Avila ED, de Matos Moraes F, Castanharo SM, Del’Acqua MA, de Assis Mollo F Jr. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques. J Oral Implantol 2014; 40(6): 633-9.
25- Rutkunas V1, Ignatovic J. A technique to splint and verify the accuracy of implant impression copings with light-polymerizing acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 111(3): 254-6.
26- Tarib NA, Seong TW, Chuen KM, Kun MS, Ahmad M, Kamarudin KH. Evaluation of splinting implant impression techniques: two dimensional analyses. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2012; 20(1): 35-9.
27- Bajoghli F, Sabouhi M, Nosouhian S, Davoudi A, Behnamnia Z. Comparing the accuracy of three different impression materials in making duplicate dies. J Int Oral Health 2015; 7(7): 12-6.
Journal of Isfahan Dental School
Volume 16, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
January 2021
Pages 401-408