Evaluation of Prevalence of Hypodontia Based on Sex, Dental and Skeletal Relationship in Patients Admitted to Ahvaz Dental School

Document Type : مقاله‌های پژوهشی

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Dentist, Tehran, Iran

3 Student, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Hypodontia is the most prevalent dental anomaly that might cause clinical complications. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of hypodontia in relation with sex in permanent teeth, skeletal malocclusion and dental crowding among orthodontic patients admitted to Ahvaz Dental School.
Materials and Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, dental casts, panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms related to patients that were admitted to Department of Orthodontics of Ahvaz Dental School during 2018-2019 were investigated, to establish the existence of hypodontia, type of skeletal relationship, age, sex and dental crowding in the permanent dentition. The data were analyzed using a chi-square test in IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25 with statistical significance set at p value < 0.05.
Results: Among 331 patients which were included 257 females (77.65%) and 74 males, prevalence of hypodontia was 9.4% (31 patients, 10.5% in females, 5.5% in males). The difference between the genders in term of hypodontia was not significant (p value = 0.257).
This condition was existed from the dental and skeletal relationship point of view: hypodontia was observed in 19 patients (61.4%) with class Ⅰ relationship, 9 patients (29%) with skeletal class Ⅱ and 3 patients (9.6%) with skeletal class skeletal class ⅠⅠⅠ relationship. The difference between skeletal relationship and hypodontia was not significant (p value = 0.370). Dental crowding was observed in 24 patients (77.4%). There was not significant difference between dental crowding and hypodontia (p value = 0.276).
Conclusion: Hypodontia was more prevalent in females but there was no significant difference between the prevalence of hypodontia in males and females. Previous studies have shown that the prevalence of hypodontia in Iran similar to current study.
Keywords: Anodontia, Prevalence, Crowding, Orthodontics

1. Amini F, Rakhshan V, Babaei P. Prevalence and pattern of hypodontia in the permanent dentition of 3374 Iranian orthodontic patients. Dent Res J 2012; 9(3): 245-50.
2. Gokkaya B, Kargul B. Prevalence and pattern of non-syndromic hypodontia in a group of Turkish children. Acta Stomatol Croat 2016; 50(1): 58-64.
3. Jimenez-Castellanos E, Carmona A, Catalina-Herrera C, Cordero E, Jimenez-Castellanos J. Variations in the number of human permanent teeth: Hypodontia. Eur J Anat 2005; 9(1): 23-7.
4. Soni HK, Joshi M, Desai H, Vasavada M. An orthopantomographic study of prevalence of hypodontia and hyperdontia in permanent dentition in Vadodara, Gujarat. Indian J Dent Res 2018; 29(4): 529-33.
5. Fekonja A. Hypodontia in orthodontically treated children. Eur J Orthod 2005; 27(5): 457-60.
6. Polder BJ, Van’t Hof MA, Van der Linden FP, Kuijpers‐Jagtman AM. A meta‐analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004; 32(3): 217-26.
7. Al-Ani AH, Antoun JS, Thomson WM, Merriman TR, Farella M. Hypodontia: An update on its etiology, classification, and clinical management. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017.
8. Sisman Y, Uysal T, Gelgor IE. Hypodontia. Does the prevalence and distribution pattern differ in orthodontic patients? Eur J Dent 2007; 1(3): 167-73.
9. Silva Meza R. Radiographic assessment of congenitally missing teeth in orthodontic patients. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003; 13(2): 112-6.
10. Abrantes C, Santos R, Pestana D, Pereira CP. Application of dental morphological characteristics for medical-legal identification: Sexual diagnosis in a Portuguese population. J Forensic Legal Investig Sci 2015; 1: 001.
11. Takahashi Y, Higashihori N, Yasuda Y, Takada J-i, Moriyama K. Examination of craniofacial morphology in Japanese patients with congenitally missing teeth: A cross-sectional study. Prog Orthod 2018; 19(1): 38-45.
12. Vidaković A, Anić-Milošević S, Nikolov Borić D, Meštrović S. Mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions in croatian orthodontic hypodontia patients‘ teeth. Acta Stomatol Croat 2018; 52(1): 12-7.
13. Rakhshan V. Congenitally missing teeth (hypodontia): A review of the literature concerning the etiology, prevalence, risk factors, patterns and treatment. Dent Res J 2015; 12(1): 1-13.
14. Jacobs SG. The impacted maxillary canine. Further observations on aetiology, radiographic localization, prevention/interception of impaction, and when to suspect impaction. Aust Dent J 1996; 41(5): 310-6.
15. Nunn J, Carter NE, Gillgrass TJ, Hobson RS, Jepson NJ, Meechan JG, et al. The interdisciplinary management of hypodontia: background and role of paediatric dentistry. Br Dent J 2003; 194(5): 245-51.
16. Wu CC-L, Wong RW-K, Hagg E. A review of hypodontia: the possible etiologies and orthodontic, surgical and restorative treatment options: Conventional and futuristic. Hong Kong Dental Journal 2007; 4(2): 113-21.
17. Nick-Hussein NN. Hypodontia in the permanent dentition: a study of its prevalence in Malaysian children. Aust Orthod J 1989; 11(2): 93-5.
18. Eidelman E, Chosack A, Rosenzweig KA. Hypodontia: prevalence amongst Jewish populations of different origin. Am J Phys Anthropol 1973; 39(1): 129-33.
19. Varela M, Arrieta P, Ventureira C. Non-syndromic concomitant hypodontia and supernumerary teeth in an orthodontic population. Eur J Orthod 2009; 31(6): 632-7.
20. Dwijendra K, Parikh V, George SS, Kukkunuru GT, Chowdary GN. Association of dental anomalies with different types of malocclusions in pretreatment orthodontic patients. J Int Oral Health 2015; 7(6): 61-4.
21. Endo T, Ozoe R, Yoshino S, Shimooka S. Hypodontia patterns and variations in craniofacial morphology in Japanese orthodontic patients. The Angle Orthodontist 2006; 76(6): 996-1003.
22. Kumar SK, Lakshmi A, Namita S, Elumalai M. Craniofacial morphologic variations and its association with hypodontia pattern (Anterior) in South Indian female population. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia 2013; 10(1): 325-8.
23. Chung CJ, Han JH, Kim KH. The pattern and prevalence of hypodontia in Koreans. Oral Diseases 2008; 14(7): 620-5.
24. Vahid-Dastjerdi E, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Mahdian M, Amini N. Non-syndromic hypodontia in an Iranian orthodontic population. J Oral Sci 2010; 52(3): 455-61.
25. Acharya PN, Jones SP, Moles D, Gill D, Hunt NP. A cephalometric study to investigate the skeletal relationships in patients with increasing severity of hypodontia. The Angle Orthodontist 2010; 80(4): 511-8.
26. Celikoglu M, Kazanci F, Miloglu O, Oztek O, Kamak H, Ceylan I. Frequency and characteristics of tooth agenesis among an orthodontic patient population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15(5): e797-801.
27. Hirukawa K, Iwata R, Kurosawa M, Kondo T, Goto S. Statistical investigation about the prevalence of congenitally missing permanent teeth. Orthodontic Waves 1999; 58(1): 49-56.
28. Forgie AH, Thind BS, Larmour CJ, Mossey PA, Stirrups DR. Management of hypodonhia: Restorative considerations. Part III. Quintessence Int 2005; 36(6): 437-45.