Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Setting Expansion of GC and Adenta Dye Stones

Document Type : مقاله‌های پژوهشی

Authors

1 Postgraduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, Dental Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Dentist, Zahedan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran

10.48305/v0i0.1670

Abstract

 



Introduction: The aim of this study was the Evaluation of compressive strength and setting expansion of GC and Adenta dye stones.
Materials and Methods: This study was an experimental study. The sample number was 21 for each group (n = 21). Compressive strength and setting expansion of GC and Adenta dye stones was tested based on ADA Standard 25 and Iranian Standard No. 2792. Data analysis was done with Independent-Sample t-test (p value = 0.05).
Results: There was no significant difference between GC (47.61 ± 5.54) and Adenta groups (44.31 ± 7.71) in terms of compressive strength. Also, there was no significant difference in the setting expansion between GC (0.07 ± 0.008) and Adenta dye stones (0.08 ± 0.001).
Conclusions: The results of this study showed that there is no statistically significant difference in setting expansion and compressive strength between GC and Adenta dye stones and both samples was under standard condition (p value < 0.05).
Keywords: Dental casting investment, Dental gypsum, Compressive strength.

References

1. Anusavice K, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips' science of dental materials. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.
2. Golbidi F, Kiani M, Ebrahimi M. Evaluation of physical properties of Khodabandeloo plaster: An invitro study. J Dent Sch Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci 2006; 24(2): 235-42. [In Persian].
3. American National Standards/American Dental Association Specifications. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. J Am Dent Assoc 1983; 107(4): 640-1.
4. Winkler MM, Monaghan P, Gilbert JL, Lautenschlager EP. Comparison of four techniques for monitoring the setting kinetics of gypsum. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79(5): 532-6.
5. de Silva MAB, Pino R, Consani S, Sinhoreti MAC, Mesquita MF, Consani RLX. Linear dimensional change, compressive strength and detail reproduction in type IV dental stone dried at room temperature and in a microwave oven. J Appl Oral Sci 2012; 20(5): 588-93.
6. Freitas CAD, Zanotti TS, Rizzante FAP, Furuse AY, Freitas MFAD. Linear setting expansion of different gypsum products. RSBO (Online) 2015; 12(1): 61-7.
7. He LH, van Vuuren LJ, Planitz N, Swain MV. A micro-mechanical evaluation of the effects of die hardener on die stone. Dent Mater J 2010; 29(4): 433-7.
8. Sahebi S, Rocni Sh. Influence of temprature moisture and time on dimensional change of stone type IV. J Dent Med 2004; 17(2): 94-100.
9. Nor SZM, Ismail R, Isa MIN. Porosity and Strength Properties of Gypsum Bonded Investment using Terengganu Local Silica for Copper Alloys Casting. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 2015; 10(7): 921-31.
10. Heshmati RH, Nagy WW, Wirth CG, Dhuru VB. Delayed linear expansion of improved dental stone. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88(1): 26-31.
11. Lautenschlager EP, Corbin F. Investigation on the expansion of dental stone. J Dent Res 1969; 48(2): 206-10.
12. Abdullah MA. Surface detail, compressive strength, and dimensional accuracy of gypsum casts after repeated immersion in hypochlorite solution. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95(6): 462-8.
13. Sabouhi M, Khodaeian N, Soltani M, Ataei E. Comparison of physical properties of an Iranian and a German Dental Stone Type IV According to ADA Specifications. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran 2013; 25(2): 117-23. [In Persian].
14. Golbidi F, Davari M. A study of three physical properties in Hard Iranian Gypsum (Pars Dandan and Almas). J Islam Dent Assoc Iran 2003; 14(4): 51-64. [In Persian].
15. Fairhurst CW. Compressive properties of dental gypsum. J Dent Res 1960; 39(4): 812-24.
16. Mahler DB, Ady AB. The influence of various factors on the effective setting expansion of casting investments. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1963; 13(2): 365-73.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics