Cost Analysis of Maxillofacial Trauma in Shiraz Shahid Rajayee Hospital
Document Type : مقالههای پژوهشی
Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2 Dentist, Shiraz, Iran
10.48305/v0i0.1831
Abstract
Introduction: Accidents are one of the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in different societies. One of the prevalent complications of crash and other accidents is maxillofacial fractures which in addition to abundant difficulties for patients has a high burden for health system of countries. So the aim of this study was analytical evaluation of financial burden of maxillofacial trauma with respect to demographic variables, therefore the costs of maxillofacial traumas were evaluated in Shiraz.
Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, records of 200 patients hospitalized for maxillofacial trauma in Shiraz Shahid Rajayee hospital during 2018 to 2019 were evaluated. Costs of different parts of treatment, trauma mechanisms in addition to demographic characteristics (age and gender) were recorded for each patient. Data analysis was carried out by descriptive analysis.
Results: Of total of 200 patients were hospitalized due to the maxillofacial injuries, 40 (20 %) were female and 160 (80%) were male. The age average was 39.9 years. The most common cause of trauma was crashes (81.5%). In average, 89272763 Rials was spent for each patient.
Conclusion: Results of the current study demonstrated that a huge budget is spent each year for accident patients whom have maxillofacial fractures.
Key words: Maxillofacial injuries, Costs and cost analysis, Accidents.
Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, records of 200 patients hospitalized for maxillofacial trauma in Shiraz Shahid Rajayee hospital during 2018 to 2019 were evaluated. Costs of different parts of treatment, trauma mechanisms in addition to demographic characteristics (age and gender) were recorded for each patient. Data analysis was carried out by descriptive analysis.
Results: Of total of 200 patients were hospitalized due to the maxillofacial injuries, 40 (20 %) were female and 160 (80%) were male. The age average was 39.9 years. The most common cause of trauma was crashes (81.5%). In average, 89272763 Rials was spent for each patient.
Conclusion: Results of the current study demonstrated that a huge budget is spent each year for accident patients whom have maxillofacial fractures.
Key words: Maxillofacial injuries, Costs and cost analysis, Accidents.
1. Mashreky SR, Rahman A, Khan TF, Faruque M, Svanström L, Rahman F. Hospital burden of road traffic injury: Major concern in primary and secondary level hospitals in Bangladesh. Public Health 2010; 124(4): 185-9.
2. Bastida JL, Aguilar PS, Gonzalez BD. The economic costs of traffic accidents in Spain. J Trauma 2004; 56(4): 888-9.
3. Garcia-Altes A, Puig-Junoy J. What is the social cost of injured people in traffic collisions? An assessment for Catalonia. J Trauma 2011; 70(3): 744-50.
4. Connelly LB, Supangan R. The economic costs of road traffic crashes: Australia, states and territories. Accid Anal Prev 2006; 38(6): 1087-93.
5. Curtis k, Lam M, Mitchell R, DicksonC, McDonnell K. Major trauma: the unseen financial burden to trauma centres, a descriptive multicentre analysis. Aus Health Rev 2014: 38(1): 30-7.
6. Moncrieff NJ, Qureshi C, Deva AK. A comparative cost analysis of maxillofacial trauma in Australia. J Craniofac Surg 2004; 15(4): 686-91.
7. Mohtasham-Amiri Z, Dastgiri S, Davoudi-Kiakalyeh A, Imani A, Mollarahimi K. An epidemiological study of road traffic accidents in Guilan Province, Northern Iran in 2012. Bull Emerg Trauma 2016; 4(4): 230-5.
8. Haug RH, Prather J, Indresano AT. An epidemiologic survey of facial fractures and concomitant injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 48(9): 926-32.
9. James RB, Fredrickson C, Kent JN. A prospective study of mandibular fractures. J Oral Surg 1981; 39(4): 275-81.
10. Manouchehrifar M, Hatamabadi HR, Derakhshandeh N. Treatment costs of traffic accident casualties in a Third-level hospital in Iran; a preliminary study. Emerg (Tehran) 2014; 2(1): 40-2.
11. Moncrieff NJ, Qureshi C, Deva AK. Comparative cost analysis of maxillofacial trauma in Australia. J Craniofac Surg 2004; 15(4): 686-91.
12. Yang Y, Li PJ, Shuai T, Wang Y, Mao C, Yu GY, et al. Cost analysis of oral and maxillofacial free flap reconstruction for patients at an institution in China. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 48(5): 590-6.
13. Chang CS, Chu MW, Nelson JA, Basta M, Gerety P, Kanchwala SK, Wu LC. Complications and cost analysis of intraoperative arterial complications in head and neck free flap reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33(5): 318-27.
14. Forner D, Phillips T, Rigby M, Hart R, Taylor M, Trites J. Submental island flap reconstruction reduces cost in oral cancer reconstruction compared to radial forearm free flap reconstruction: a case series and cost analysis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 45(4): 11-6.
15. De Paepe A, Vandeneede N, Strens D, Specenier P. Medical cost associated with treatment and follow-up of patients with head and neck cancer. Value Health 2015; 18(7): 449-54.
16. Rezaei S, Akbari AB, Arab M. Estimating hospital costs and other health services expenses of road traffic crashes in Iran, 2009. Hakim Res J 2013; 16(3): 192-200. [In Persian].
17. Nazari R, Bijani A, HAJI HF, Beheshti Z, Sharifnia S, Hojati H. Mortality and injury severity in the accident victims referred to the Hefdah Shahrivar Hospital of Amol; 2007. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2011; 13(1): 76-81. [In Persian].
18. Lim SJ, Chung WJ, Cho WH. Economic burden of injuries in South Korea. Inj Prev 2011; 17(5): 291-6.
)