Evaluation of Dimensional Changes of Graft Material in Sinuses Reinforced by Lateral Window Lift Sinus

Document Type : مقاله‌های پژوهشی

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

5 Dentist, Aarak, Iran

6 Post Graduated Student, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Maxillary sinus augmentation and placement of dental implants is a well-established technique for functional and esthetic rehabilitation of partially or completely edentulous patients with severe maxillary atrophy. This study aimed to investigate dimensional changes of xenogarfts + allografts used for maxillary sinus augmentation in three directions and aspects of height, length and thickness by six months after sinus augmentation.
Materials and Methods: A total of 12 patients who underwent maxillary sinus augmentation by the approach of lateral window open sinus lift in Tehran university of medical sciences, and by application of xenografts + allografts were radiologically followed up and sequences of CBCT (Cone beam computed tomography) images taken immediately after graft placement and six months later. Data analyzed with Paired T-test in the 0.05 level of significance.
Results: The calculated mean resorption in aspects of height, length and thickness of grafted materials after six months was  2.99, 2, 37 and 1, 72 mm. with SD of 2.64-1.41 and 1.95.
Conclusion: In compared results of our study and other similar articles, it considered that directional changes of xenografts + allografts by six months after graft placement is mild to moderate, but it provides a reasonable density of new bone formation before implant placement.
Keywords: Maxillary sinus, Sinus floor augmentation, Alveolar bone grafting.

1. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003; 8(1): 328-43.
2. Scarano A, Degidi M, Iezzi G, Pecora G, Piattelli M, Orsini G, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation with different biomaterials: a comparative histologic and histomorphometric study in man. Implant Dent 2006; 15(2): 197-207.
3. Park JB. Radiographic follow-up evaluation of sinus augmentation with deproteinized bovine bone and implant installation after loading. Indian J Dent Res 2010; 21(4): 603-5.
4. Norton MR, Odell EW, Thompson ID, Cook RJ. Efficacy of bovine bone mineral for alveolar augmentation: a human histologic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14(6): 775-83.
5. Tatum H, Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986; 30(2): 207-29.
6. Misch CE, Dietsh F. Bone-grafting materials in implant dentistry. Implant Dent 1993; 2(3): 158-67.
7. Guarnieri R, Grassi R, Ripari M, Pecora G. Maxillary sinus augmentation using granular calcium sulfate (surgiplaster sinus): radiographic and histologic study at 2 years. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26(1): 79-85.
8 .Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980; 38(8): 613-6.
9. Block MS, Kent JN. Sinus augmentation for dental implants: The use of autogenous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55(11): 1281-6.
10. Aguirre Zorzano LA, Rodriguez Tojo MJ, Aguirre Urizar JM. Maxillary sinus lift with intraoral autologous bone and B--tricalcium phosphate: histological and histomorphometric clinical study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007; 12(7): E532-E536.
11. Zerbo IR, Zijderveld SA, de BA, Bronckers AL, de LG, ten Bruggenkate CM, et al. Histomorphometry of human sinus floor augmentation using a porous beta-tricalcium phosphate: A prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15(6): 724-32.
12. Yan X, Zhang X, Gao J, Matsushita Y, Koyano K, Jiang X, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation without grafting material with simultaneous implant installation: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17(3): 515-24.
13. Valentini P, Abensur D. Maxillary sinus floor elevation for implant placement with demineralized freeze-dried bone and bovine bone (Bio-Oss): a clinical study of 20 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997; 17(3): 232-41.
14. Lekholm U, Wannfors K, Isaksson S, Adielsson B. Oral implants in combination with bone grafts. A 3-year retrospective multicenter study using the Branemark implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28(3): 181-7.
15. Moy PK, Lundgren S, Holmes RE. Maxillary sinus augmentation: histomorphometric analysis of graft materials for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51(8): 857-62.
16. Martos DP, Naval GL, Sastre PJ, Gonzalez GR, Bances del CF, Mancha dlP, et al. Sinus elevation by in situ utilization of bone scrapers: technique and results. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007; 12(7): E537-E541.
17. Sartori S, Silvestri M, Forni F, Icaro CA, Tesei P, Cattaneo V. Ten-year follow-up in a maxillary sinus augmentation using anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss). A case report with histomorphometric evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14(3): 369-72.
18. Blaggana V, Gill AS, Blaggana A. A clinical and radiological evaluation of the relative efficacy of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft versus anorganic bovine bone xenograft in the treatment of human infrabony periodontal defects: A 6 months follow-up study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014; 18(5): 601-7.
19. Calasans-Maia MD, Mourao CF, Alves AT, Sartoretto SC, de Uzeda MJ, Granjeiro JM. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a new Xenograft: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17(Suppl 2): e586-e593.