Journal of Isfahan Dental School

Characteristics of Juxta-apical Radiolucency as Risk Factor of Inferior Alveolar Injury

Document Type : مقاله‌های پژوهشی

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Postgraduate Student, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3 Dentist, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Juxta-apical radiolucency (JAR) is introduced as a new risk factor for inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury; following the removal of the third molar. Thus, the aim of the present study was to examine the relationship of JAR to IAN, cortical plates, and its position with regards to IAN and tooth angulation.
Materials and Methods: The present case-control study comprising a sample of 545 Cone Beamed CT scans of mandibular third molars examined 75 JAR cases and 75 control teeth. The relationship of JAR to IAN, its position with regards to IAN, lingual cortical plate thinning, teeth position and angulation were investigated. Descriptive analyses, chi-square and fisher exact tests were performed with a value of 0.05 considered significant.
Results: Mesioangular teeth were the most common in both groups. Based on tooth angulation, no significant difference was detected between case and control groups (p value = 0.346). There was no significant difference between the two groups, with regards to JAR and tooth proximity to IAN (p value = 0.578). Although, the most prevalent position in the JAR group was lingual and superior in the control group, but no significant difference was observed between them (p value = 0.122). Most cases of JAR (84.0%) and most cases of control group (77.3%) showed some degree of cortical thinning. Based on this, no significant difference was present between the JAR and control groups (p value = 0.626).
Conclusion: JAR is generally in contact with mandibular canal and some degree of cortical thinning manifest in most of these cases. These findings suggest a possible increase in the risk of nerve injury during surgical removal of third molars.
Keywords: Mandibular nerve, Third molar, Cone-beam computed tomography.

1. Mehdizadeh M, Haghanifar S, Seyedmajidi M, Bijani A, Soufizadeh R. Radiographic evaluation of impacted third molars and their complications in a group of Iranian population. Journal of Research and Practice in Dentistry 2014; 2014: m1-11.
2. Grossi GB, Maiorana C, Garramone RA, Borgonovo A, Creminelli L, Santoro F. Assessing postoperative discomfort after third molar surgery: a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65(5): 901-17.
3. Renton T. Oral surgery: part 4. Minimising and managing nerve injuries and other complications. Br Dent J 2013; 215(8): 393-9.
4. Renton T, Hankins M, Sproate C, McGurk M. A randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the incidence of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve as a result of coronectomy and removal of mandibular third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 43(1): 7-12.
5. Loescher A, Smith KG, Robinson PP. Nerve damage and third molar removal. Dent update 2003; 30(7): 375-80.
6. Kipp DP, Goldstein BH, Weiss Jr WW. Dysesthesia after mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study and analysis of 1,377 surgical procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 100(2): 185-92.
7. Wofford DT, Miller RI. Prospective study of dysesthesia following odontectomy of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 45(1): 15-9.
8. Rood J, Shehab BN. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 28(1): 20-5.
9. Gilvetti C, Haria S, Gulati A. Is juxta-apical radiolucency a reliable risk factor for injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during removal of lower third molars? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 57(5): 430-4.
10. Umar G, Bryant C, Obisesan O, Rood J. Correlation of the radiological predictive factors of inferior alveolar nerve injury with cone beam computed tomography findings. Oral Surgery 2010; 3(3): 72-82.
11. Nascimento EHL, Oenning ACC, Nadaes MR, Ambrosano GMB, Haiter-Neto F, Freitas DQ. Juxta-apical radiolucency: relation to the mandibular canal and cortical plates based on cone beam CT imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017; 123(3): 401-7.
12. Nascimento EHL, Oenning ACC, Freire BB, Gaêta-Araujo H, Haiter-Neto F, Freitas DQ. Comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT in the assessment of juxta-apical radiolucency. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017; 47(1): 20170198.
13. Nascimento EHL, Oenning ACC, Nadaes MR, Ambrosano GMB, Haiter-Neto F, Freitas DQ. Juxta-apical radiolucency: Prevalence, characterization, and association with the third molar status. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 76(4): 716-24.
14. Yalcin ED, Artas A. Juxta-apical radiolucency and relations with surrounding structures on cone-beam computed tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 58(3): 309-13.
15. Winter GB. Principles of exodontia as applied to the impacted third molar: a complete treatise on the operative technic with clinical diagnoses and radiographic interpretations. St Louis, Mo: American Medical Book Co 1926; p. 21-58.
16. Kapila R, Harada N, Araki K, Sano T, Goto T. Evaluation of juxta-apical radiolucency in cone beam CT images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014; 43(5): 20130402.
17. Kapila R, Harada N, Araki K, Sano T, Goto TK. Relationships between third-molar juxta-apical radiolucencies and mandibular canals in panoramic and cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014; 117(5): 640-4.
18. Ghaeminia H, Meijer G, Soehardi A, Borstlap W, Mulder J, Berge S. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 38(9): 964-71.
Journal of Isfahan Dental School
Volume 17, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
December 2020
Pages 343-350