The effect of Type and Mode of Light Curing Units on Degree of Conversion of Bulk Fill Composites
Document Type : مقالههای پژوهشی
Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
10.48305/v0i0.1938
Abstract
Introduction: Adequate polymerization is a critical factor in obtaining optimal physical and mechanical properties and a satisfying clinical performance of composite restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of type and mode of light curing unites on degree of conversion (DC) of Bulk Fill composites (Xtra-fill andTetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill) compared with a conventional composite (Tetric N-Ceram).
Materials and Methods: This in-vitro experimental study was conducted in Kerman and Tehran School of Dentistry in 2019. Number of 15 uncured composites and 45 composite discs were fabricated using the Teflon molds with a 4 mm thick and 10 mm diameter and light cured from the top using LED ramp, LED and QTH curing units for 20 seconds. Bulk Fill composites (Xtra-fill andTetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill) were placed with a 4mm_thick increment and conventional composite (Tetric N-Ceram) was placed incrementally (with 2 mm thickness in each layer). The degree of conversion of top and bottom surfaces of composites were measured using the Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). The results were analyzed with Two-way ANOVA and Tukey̛ s test. p value < 0.05 was set at the level of significant.
Results: In all samples, the DC value of top surfaces was significantly higher than the 4mm depth (p value < 0.05). Overally, there were no significant differences between the DC value of tested composites(p value > 0.05), But LED light in ramp mode showed significantly better results compared to LED and QTH light sources(p value < 0.05). The type and mode of light cure units had no influence on DC of bulk fill composites (p value > 0.05), but the DC of conventional composite with QTH and LED ramp was significantly higher than LED (p value < 0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the DC value of bulk fill composites were not significantly affected by the type and mode of light cure units, and all investigated bulk fill composites obtained clinically acceptable degree of conversion at 4 mm depth.
Key words: Resin composite, Polymerization, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR).
Materials and Methods: This in-vitro experimental study was conducted in Kerman and Tehran School of Dentistry in 2019. Number of 15 uncured composites and 45 composite discs were fabricated using the Teflon molds with a 4 mm thick and 10 mm diameter and light cured from the top using LED ramp, LED and QTH curing units for 20 seconds. Bulk Fill composites (Xtra-fill andTetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill) were placed with a 4mm_thick increment and conventional composite (Tetric N-Ceram) was placed incrementally (with 2 mm thickness in each layer). The degree of conversion of top and bottom surfaces of composites were measured using the Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). The results were analyzed with Two-way ANOVA and Tukey̛ s test. p value < 0.05 was set at the level of significant.
Results: In all samples, the DC value of top surfaces was significantly higher than the 4mm depth (p value < 0.05). Overally, there were no significant differences between the DC value of tested composites(p value > 0.05), But LED light in ramp mode showed significantly better results compared to LED and QTH light sources(p value < 0.05). The type and mode of light cure units had no influence on DC of bulk fill composites (p value > 0.05), but the DC of conventional composite with QTH and LED ramp was significantly higher than LED (p value < 0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the DC value of bulk fill composites were not significantly affected by the type and mode of light cure units, and all investigated bulk fill composites obtained clinically acceptable degree of conversion at 4 mm depth.
Key words: Resin composite, Polymerization, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR).
1.Ozturk B, Cobanoglu N, Cetin AR, Gunduz B. Conversion degrees of resin composites using different light sources. Eur J Dent 2013; 7(1): 102-9.
2.Bala O, Uçtasli MB, Tüz MA. Barcoll hardness of different resin-based composites cured by halogen or light emitting diode (LED). Oper Dent 2005; 30(1): 69-74.
3.Chung KH, Greener EH. Correlation between degree of conversion, filler concentration and mechanical properties of posterior composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 1990; 17(5): 487-94.
4.Bala O, Olmez A, Kalayci S. Effect of LED and halogen light curing on polymerization of resin‐based composites. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32(2): 134-40.
5.Parisay I, Bahrololomi Z, Ghafournia M, Solaimani AA, Boruziniat A. The effects of exposure times and light curing sources on surface micro-hardness of a resin modified glass ionomer. J Dent Mater and Tech 2014; 3(2): 77-81. [In Persian].
6.Kaviani A, Dabaghi Tabriz F, Khalaj K, Neshati A. Comparison of the effect of three LED light modes and conventional QTH curing light on shear bond strength of composite to dentin. J Dent Sch 2013; 31(4): 210-5. [In Persian].
7.Dionysopoulos D, Tolidis K, Gerasimou P. The effect of composition, temperature and post-irradiation curing of bulk fill resin composites on polymerization efficiency. Mater Res 2016; 19(2): 466-73.
8.Orłowski M, Tarczydło B, Chałas R. Evaluation of marginal integrity of four bulk-fill dental composite materials: in vitro study. ScientificWorldJournal 2015; 2015: 701262.
9.Zorzin J, Maier E, Harre S, Fey T, Belli R, Lohbauer U, et al. Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization properties and extended light curing. Dent Mater 2015; 31(3): 293-301.
10.Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014; 42(8): 993-1000.
11.Olegario IC, Hesse D, Bönecker M, Imparato JCP, Braga MM, Mendes FM, et al. Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus atraumatic restorative treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17(1): 34.
12. Jafarzadeh Kashi TJ, Erfan M, Fazel Najafabadi A, Fatemi SM, Behroozibakhsh M, Hali H. Degree of conversion of micro-hybrid, nano-hybrid and Ormocer composites using LED and QTH light-curing units. J Dent Med Tehran Univ Med Sci 2012; 25(2): 85-90. [In Persian].
13. Soygun K, Unal M, Ozer A, Gulnahar E, Bolayır G. Effects of different curing unites on bulk fill composites. Int J Oral Dent Health 2015; 1: 3.
14. Mirzaee M, Yassini E, Kharazifard MJ, Vaziri M. Shear bond strength of composite to dentin following light curing with light emitting diode and quartz tungsten halogen light curing units. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran 2015; 27(4): 168-72. [In Persian].
15.Oberholzer TG, Du Preez IC, Kidd M. Effect of LED curing on the microleakage, shear bond strength and surface hardness of a resin-based composite restoration. Biomaterials. 2005; 26(18): 3981-6.
16.Rajisha K, Sujatha I, Jayalalakshmi K, Prasannalatha Nadig D, Prathyusha D, Savitri D, et al. An in vitro evaluation of microleakage of a bulk fill composite resin in class V cavities cured by two pulse modes. Int J Appl Dent Sci 2016; 2(4): 19-22 .
17.Farahat F, Daneshkazemi AR, Hajiahmadi Z. The effect of bulk depth and irradiation time on the surface hardness and degree of cure of bulk-fill composites. J Dent Biomater 2016; 3(3): 284-91.
18.Tarle Z, Meniga A, Knežević A, Šutalo J, Ristić M, Pichler G. Composite conversion and temperature rise using a conventional, plasma arc, and an experimental blue LED curing unit. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29(7): 662-7.
19.Hammouda IM. Effect of light-curing method on wear and hardness of composite resin. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2010; 3(2): 216-22.
20.Sgarbi SC, Pereira SK, Martins JMH, Oliveira MAC, Mazur RF. Degree of conversion of resin composites light activated by halogen light and led analyzed by ultraviolet spectrometry. Rev Clin Pesq Odontol 2010; 6(3): 223-30.
21.Alshali RZ, Silikas N, Satterthwaite JD. Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventional resin-composites at two time intervals. Dent Mater 2013; 29(9): e213-7.
22. Price RB, Derand T, Loney RW, Andreou P. Effect of light source and specimen thickness on the surface hardness of resin composite. Am J Dent 2002; 15(1): 47-53.
)