مجله دانشکده دندان‌پزشکی اصفهان

ارتباط بین تیپ شخصیتی با میزان همکاری و رضایت‌مندی از درمان در بیماران بالغ تحت درمان ارتودنسی ثابت

نوع مقاله : مقاله‌های پژوهشی

چکیده

مقدمه: همکاری بیمار در درمان ارتودنسی، یکی از مهم‌ترین پیش‌بینی کننده‌های نتیجه‌ی‌ درمان می‌باشد. ارزﯾﺎﺑﯽ ﻣﯿﺰان رﺿﺎﯾﺖ ﺑﯿﻤﺎر، ﻣﻌﯿﺎری ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺮای ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ شیوه‌‌ی درﻣﺎن، ﮐﯿﻔیت آن و ﻫﻤﭽﻨین رابطه‌ی‌ ﭘﺰشک و ﺑﯿﻤﺎر بشمار می‌رود. هدف از این مطالعه، بررسی ارتباط میان برخی ویژگی‌های شخصیتی بیماران با میزان همکاری آنان در درمان ارتودنسی بود.
مواد و روش‌ها: در این مطالعه‌ی توصیفی، 135 نفر از افرادی که برای درمان ثابت ارتودنسی، به بخش ارتودنسی دانشکده‌ی دندان‌پزشکی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اصفهان مراجعه کرده بودند، انتخاب شدند. بعد از انتخاب افراد، پرسش‌نامه‌های NEO-FFI و رضایت‌مندی در اختیار آن‌ها قرار گرفت. همبستگی میان 5 فاکتور روانشناسی نظریه‌ی پنج عاملی شخصیت Costa و McCrae، با میزان همکاری و رضایت بیماران در طی درمان ارتودنسی بررسی شد. داده‌ها با استفاده از ضرایب همبستگی Pearson، Spearman و Regression  آنالیز شدند.
یافته‌ها: میانگین نمره‌ی همکاری بین 2 و 6 ماه بعد از شروع درمان، اختلاف معنی‌دار نداشت (0/66 = p value). نمره‌ی رضایت‌مندی از درمان با نمره‌ی عامل شخصیتی مسؤولیت‌پذیری رابطه‌ی مستقیم داشت (0/01 = p value) اما با نمرات سایر عوامل شخصیتی رابطه‌ی معنی‌دار نداشت (0/05 < p value). نمره‌ی همکاری 2 و 6 ماه بعد از شروع درمان با نمرات عوامل شخصیتی، رابطه‌ی معنی‌دار نداشت (0/05 < p value). بین نمره‌ی همکاری 2 ماه (0/57 = p value) و 6 ماه بعد از شروع درمان (0/99 = p value) با نمره‌ی رضایت‌مندی از درمان رابطه‌ی معنی‌دار وجود نداشت.
نتیجه‌گیری: بین همکاری بیماران ارتودنسی و تیپ شخصیتی آن‌ها، ارتباطی وجود نداشت. بین رضایتمندی بیماران ارتودنسی و نمره‌ی عامل شخصیتی مسؤولیت‌پذیری رابطه‌ی مستقیم وجود داشت.
کلید واژه‌ها: ارتودنسی، روانشناسی، همکاری بیماران

عنوان مقاله [English]

Relationship between Psychological Factors with Cooperation and Satisfaction in Fixed Orthodontic Patient

چکیده [English]

Introduction: cooperation in orthodontics is one of the most important predictors of treatment outcome. Evaluation of patient satisfaction is a suitable criterion for the evaluation of treatment and quality of the patients and the relationship between physician and patient. In this study, the relationship between some personality traits of patients with their cooperation in orthodontic treatment
Materials and Methods: In this descriptive study, 135 patients who had referred to the orthodontic department of the School of Dentistry of Isfahan Azad University for fixed orthodontic treatment were selected. The correlation between 5 psychological factors of Costa and McCrae personality theory with the level of cooperation and satisfaction of patients during orthodontic treatment was assessed by NEO-FFI questionnaire, OPCS questionnaire to measure patient cooperation 2 months and 6 months after treatment and satisfaction questionnaire. Data were analyzed using Pearson, Spearman and Regression correlation coefficients.
Results: The mean cooperation score was not significantly different between 2 months and 6 months after starting treatment (p value = 0.66). The satisfaction score of treatment was directly related to the score of the responsible factor of responsibility (p value < 0.01) but was not significantly related to the scores of other personality factors (p value > 0.05). Cooperation score 2 months and 6 months after starting treatment was not significantly related to personality factor scores (p value > 0.05). There was no significant relationship between cooperation score 2 months (p value = 0.57) and 6 months after starting treatment (p value = 0.99) with treatment satisfaction score.
Conclusion: There is no relationship between orthodontic patients' cooperation and their personality type. There is a direct relationship between orthodontic patients' satisfaction and the score of the personality factor of responsibility.
Keywords: Orthodontics, Psychology, Patient compliance

Skidmore KJ, Brook KJ, Thomson WM, Harding WJ. Factors influencing treatment time in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129(2): 230-8.
2- Zarif Najafi H, Oshagh M, Salehi P, Keshavarz H. Evaluation of fixed orthodontic patients' compliance in the clinic of Shiraz dental school: A cross-sectional study. J Dent Med 2014; 27(2): 129-36. [In Persian].
3- Lyons EK, Ramsay DS. A self-regulation model of patient compliance in orthodontics: implications for the design of a headgear monitor. Semin Orthod 2000; 6(4): 224-30.
4- Bartsch A, Witt E, Sahm G, Schneider S. Correlates to objective patient compliance with removable appliance wear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 104(4): 378-86.
5- Lahti S, Tuutti H, Hausen H, Kääriäinen R. Comparison of ideal and actual behavior of patients and dentists during dental treatment. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 1995; 23(6): 374-8.
6- Amado J, Sierra AM, Gallon A, Alvarez C, Baccetti T. Relationship between personality traits and cooperation of adolescent orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 2008; 78(4): 688-91.
7- Kacer KA, Valiathan M, Narendran S, Hans MG. Retainer wear and compliance in the first 2 years after active orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138(5): 592-8.
8- Starnbach HK, Kaplan A. Profile of an excellent orthodontic patient. Angle Orthod 1975; 45(2): 141-5.
9- Nanda RS, Kierl MJ. Prediction of cooperation in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 102(1): 15-21.
10- Bos A, Kleverlaan CJ, Hoogstraten J, Prahl-Andersen B, Kuitert Rd. Comparing subjective and objective measures of headgear compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132(6): 801-5.
11- Onyeaso CO, BeGole EA. Orthodontic treatment need in an accredited graduate orthodontic center in North America: a pilot study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7(2): 87-94.
12- Mascarenhas AK. Patient satisfaction with the comprehensive care model of dental care delivery. J Dent Educ 2001; 65(11): 1266-71.
13- Hudak PL, McKeever P, Wright JG. The metaphor of patients as customers: Implications for measuring satisfaction. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56(2): 103-8.
14- Steele JG, Ayatollahi SM, Walls AW, Murray JJ. Clinical factors related to reported satisfaction with oral function amongst dentate older adults in England. Community Dent Oral Epiemiol 1997; 25(2): 143-9.
15- Leao A, Sheiham A. Relation between clinical dental status and subjective impacts on daily living. J Dent Res 1995; 74(7): 1408-13.
16- Abu Alhaija ES, Aldaikki A, Al-Omairi MK, Al-Khateeb SN. The relationship between personality traits, pain perception and attitude toward orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2010; 80(6): 1141-9.
17- Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR. Reply to eysenck. Pers Individ Differ 1992; 13(8): 861-5.
18- Holden RR, Fekken GC. The NEO five factor inventory in a Canadian context: Psychometries properties for a sample of university women. Pers Individ Differ 1994; 17(3): 441-4.
19- Egan V, Deary I, Austin E. The NEO-FFI: Emerging British norms and an item- level analysis suggests N, A, and C are more reliable than O and E. Pers Individ Differ 2000; 29(5): 907-20.
20- Schleyer TK, Dodell D. Continuing dental education requirements for relicensure in the United States. J AM dent Assoc 2005; 136(10): 1450-6.
21- Slakter MJ, Albino JE, Fox RN, Lewis EA. Reliability and stability of the Orthodontic Patient Cooperation Scale. Am J Orthod 1980; 78(5): 559-63.
22- Sarul M, Lewandowska B, Kawala B, Kozanecka A, Antoszewska-Smith J. Objectively measured patient cooperation during early orthodontic treatment: Does psychology have an impact? Adv Clin Exp Med 2017; 26(8): 1245-51.
23- Hansen V, Liu SSY, Schrader SM, Dean JA, Stewart KT. Personality traits as a potential predictor of willingness to undergo various orthodontic treatments. Angle Orthod 2013; 83(5): 899-905.
24- Eslamipour F. Assessment of the relationship between personality traits and patient satisfaction after orthodontic treatment in Isfahan 2016. [DDS Thesis]. Isfahan, Iran: School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences; 2016. [In Persian].
مجله دانشکده دندان‌پزشکی اصفهان
دوره 18، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 2
تیر 1401
صفحه 173-179