Evaluation Cephalometric Norms in Iranian Adult Live in Ahvaz Using Mcnamara Analysis
Document Type : مقالههای پژوهشی
Authors
1 Student, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
10.48305/v0i0.1946
Abstract
Introduction: Today diagnosis and treatment planning in patients for orthodontic or surgical treatment must be consistent on the same ethnic cephalometric norms. This study aimed to determine the cephalometric norms of the Iranian sample living in Ahvaz by McNamara's analysis and to verify the existence of gender dimorphism and compare it with the standard norms and similar studies.
Materials and Methods: Cephalograms of 79 patients (39 males, 40 female in19-29 years old) were selected from the Orthodontic department of Ahvaz Dental School archive during 2018-2019. The subjects had a Class 1 molar relationship with a balanced profile, no history of orthodontic or surgical treatment or trauma, and no congenital anomalies. According to the McNamara analysis 8 linear and 4 angular measurements were traced manually and analyzed statistically by Shapiro-Wilk, independent t-test, and Mann-Whitney tests with a meaningful level of p value < 0.05.
Results: According to our findings significant differences were in the effective length of the maxilla and mandible, Maxillo-mandibular differences, Distance point A and pogonion from N perpendicular line, 1.3 lower face height (p value < 0.05) but in the upper and lower incisor position and facial axis and mandibular plane angle were not (p value > 0.05).
Conclusion: Iranian sample had more retruded Mid-face, mandible, and chin and shorter lower face height (p value < 0.05). But incisor positions, mandibular plane angle, and facial axis were in the line of McNamara norms.
Despite the differences between Iranian adults and Caucasian norms, in surgical and orthodontic treatment plane McNamara's analysis was applicable for Iranians.
Keywords: Adult, Ethnic group, Orthodontics, Cephalometric, Iranian
Materials and Methods: Cephalograms of 79 patients (39 males, 40 female in19-29 years old) were selected from the Orthodontic department of Ahvaz Dental School archive during 2018-2019. The subjects had a Class 1 molar relationship with a balanced profile, no history of orthodontic or surgical treatment or trauma, and no congenital anomalies. According to the McNamara analysis 8 linear and 4 angular measurements were traced manually and analyzed statistically by Shapiro-Wilk, independent t-test, and Mann-Whitney tests with a meaningful level of p value < 0.05.
Results: According to our findings significant differences were in the effective length of the maxilla and mandible, Maxillo-mandibular differences, Distance point A and pogonion from N perpendicular line, 1.3 lower face height (p value < 0.05) but in the upper and lower incisor position and facial axis and mandibular plane angle were not (p value > 0.05).
Conclusion: Iranian sample had more retruded Mid-face, mandible, and chin and shorter lower face height (p value < 0.05). But incisor positions, mandibular plane angle, and facial axis were in the line of McNamara norms.
Despite the differences between Iranian adults and Caucasian norms, in surgical and orthodontic treatment plane McNamara's analysis was applicable for Iranians.
Keywords: Adult, Ethnic group, Orthodontics, Cephalometric, Iranian
1. Broadbent BH. A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931; 1(2): 45-66.
2. Hofrath H. Die bedeutung der röntgenfern-und abstandsaufnahme für die diagnostik der kieferanomalien. Fortschr Orthodontic 1931; 1(2): 232-58.
3. Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships: their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 1948; 34(10): 812-40.
4. Downs WB. The role of cephalometrics in orthodontic case analysis and diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1952; 38(3): 162-82.
5. Downs WB. Analysis of the dentofacial profile. Angle Orthod 1956; 26(4): 191-212.
6. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 1953; 39(10): 729-55.
7. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod 1959; 29(1): 8-29.
8. Steiner CC. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment: report of a case. Am J Orthod 1960; 46(10): 721-35.
9. Harvold EP. The activator in interceptive orthodontics. Maryland Heights, Missouri: C. V. Mosby Co; 1974. p. 20-1.
10. Ricketts RM. A foundation for cephalometric communication. Am J Orthod 1960; 46(5): 330-57.
11. Ricketts RM, Bench RW, Hilgers JJ, Schulhof R. An overview of computerized cephalometrics. Am J Orthod 1972; 61(1): 1-28.
12. Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics: the first fifty years. Angle Orthod 1981; 51(2): 115-50.
13. GhorbanyJavadpour F, Khanemasjedi M. Soft tissue facial profile and anteroposterior lip positioning in Iranians. J Dent Sch Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci 2014; 32(2): 90-5.
.14Rakhshan V, Ghorbanyjavadpour F. Anteroposterior and vertical soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranians, interethnic comparisons, sex dimorphism, and the effect of age on cephalometric variables. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 23(2): 167-78.
15. McNamara Jr JA. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 1984; 86(6): 449-69.
16. McNamara JA, Brudon WL, Kokich VG. Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 1st ed. Needham, MA: Needham Press; 2001. p. 21.
17. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New South Wales, Australia: G. Allen & Unwin Limited; 1940. p. 114-20.
18. Jacobson A, White L. Radiographic cephalometry: from basics to 3-D imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131(4): 133.
19. Poosti M, Amini F, Darnahal A, Mokhnefi P. Normal standards of McNamara analysis in Iranian adult population. Iran J Orthod 2012; 7(1): 1-5.
.20Alam MK, Basri R, Purmal K, Sikder M, Saifuddin M, Iida J. Cephalometric norm study in a Bangladeshi population using McNamara analysis. Int Med J 2013; 20(1): 84-6.
21. Al-Barakati SF, Talic NF. Cephalometric norms for Saudi sample using McNamara analysis. Saudi Dent J 2007; 19(3): 139-45.
.22 Miyajima K, McNamara Jr JA, Kimura T, Murata S, IizukaT. Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110(4): 431-8.
23. Connor AM, Moshiri F. Orthognathic surgery norms for American black patients. Am J Orthod 1985; 87(2): 119-34.
24. Nahidh M. Iraqi cephalometric norms using McNamara’s analysis. J Bagh College Dentistry 2010; 22(3): 123-7.
25. Purmal K, Alam MK, Zam Zam NM. Cephalometric norms of Malaysian adult Indian. Int Med J 2013; 20(2): 192-6.
26. Purmal K, Alam MK, Zam Zam N. Cephalometric norms of Malaysian adult Chinese. Int Med J 2013; 20(1): 87-91.
27. Gu Y, McNamara Jr JA, Sigler LM, Baccetti T. Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33(2): 205-11.
28. Wu J, Hägg U, Rabie ABM. Chinese norms of McNamara's cephalometric analysis. Angle Orthodontic 2007; 77(1): 12-20.
29. Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the head and face in medicine. New York, NY: Elsevier; 1981. p. 25-3.
.30Legan HL, Burstone CJ. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1980; 38(10): 744-51.
)