Journal of Isfahan Dental School

Analysis of Hemodynamic Changes after Administration of Mepivacaine HCL 3% with Prilocaine 3% Solution + Felypressin

Document Type : مقاله‌های پژوهشی

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Dentist, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: With regards to the usage of local anesthetic drugs in hypertensive patients, this study is designed for comparing the effects of mepivacaine 3% and prilocaine 3% + felypressin in hemodynamic changes after inferior alveolar nerve block to help dental practitioner select anesthetic solutions for hypertensive patients considering their hemodynamic effects in order to provide patient safety.
Material and Methods: In this double blind clinical trial 32 patients were referred to oral and maxillofacial surgery department of Shiraz dentistry school in 2021 were divided into 2 groups with 16 patients in each group. In first group, inferior alveolar nerve block was accomplished by mepivacaine 3% and in the other group, prilocaine 3% and felypressin. Then systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation were measured at 4 different time points consisting of before injection, immediately after injection, 10 minutes after injection and 30 minutes after tooth extraction. The data were analyzed by ANOVA and T-test (p value < 0.05).
Results: There were no statistically significant differences in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation changes between mepivacaine and prilocaine groups during all four sampling time points. But in each group, individually there were significant differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation in different times. In addition mepivacaine causes a significant increase in systolic blood pressure immediately after injection but in contrast prilocaine + felypressin didn’t do so.
Conclusion:  We recommend prilocaine + felypressin in comparison with mepivacaine for local anesthesia in hypertensive patients.
Keywords: Mepivacaine; Prilocaine; Felypressin; Hemodynamic changes.

1. Colson P, Giudard P. Hypertension and anesthesia: what is new? J Hypertens Manage 2016; 2(1): 22-6.
2. Plana MN, Zamora J, Suresh G, Fernandez Pineda L, Thangaratinam S, Ewer AK. Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 3(3): CD011912.
3. Seminario-Amez M, Gonzalez-Navarro B, Ayuso-Montero R, Lopez-Lopez G. Use of local anesthetics with a vasoconstrictor agent during dental treatment in hypertensive and coronary disease patients. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2021; 21(2): 101569.
4. 4.Giath G. Is prilocaine safe and potent enough for use in the oral surgery of medically compromised patients. Saudi Med J 2019; 40(1): 97-100.
5. Medetalibeyoğlua A, SitreKoçb ES, Beyazb O, Edizera A. Prilocaine-induced methemoglobinemia. Case Rep Acute Med 2020; 3: 25-8.
6. Alzahrani F, Duggal MS, Munyombwe T, Tahmassebi JF. Anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for extraction and pulpotomy of mandibular primary molars: an equivalence parallel prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Paed Dent 2018; 28(3): 335-44.
7. Sharma S, Charak G. Comparison of hemodynamic changes under the effect of two different local anaesthetic procedures J Adv Med Dent Sci Res 2020; 8(2): 5-10.
8. Giath G. Does articaine, rather than prilocaine, increase the success rate of anaesthesia for extraction of maxillary teeth. Saudi J Anaesth 2020; 14(3): 297-301.
9. Nagendrababu S, Pulikkotil SJ, Suresh A, Veettil SK, Bhatia S, Setzer FC. Efficacy of local anesthetic solutions on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Int Endod J 2019; 52(6): 779-89.
10. Alsharif A, Omar E, Alolayan ABB, Bahabri R, Gazal G. 2% lidocaine versus 3% prilocaine for oral and maxillofacial surgery. Saudi J Anaesth 2018; 12(4): 571-7.
11. De Morias HHA, Holanda Vasconcellos RJ, De Santana Santos T, Rocha NS, da Costa Araújo FA, de
Carvalho RWF. Clinical study of hemodynamic changes comparing 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100000 and 1:200000 epinephrine. Oral Surg Oral Med Pathol Oral Radiol 2018; 116(1): e14-22.
12. Jayasurya NS, Jayasundara JH, Pallegama RW. Efficacy of buccal infiltration anesthesia with lidocaine for extraction of mandibularmolars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 57(3): 296-7.
13. Abu-Mustafa N, Al-ShowalkhatF, Al-ZewadK, Al-BanawaiF. Hemodynamic changes following injection of local anesthetics with different concentrations of epinephrine during simple tooth extraction. J Clin Exp Dent 2015; 7(4): 71-6.
14. De Morais HHA, De Santana Santos T, Da Costa FA. Hemodynamic changes comparing lidocaine HCL with epinephrine. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23(6): 1703-8.
15. Viscontic R, Tortamano I, Buscariolo I. Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of mepivacaine and lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2016; 42(9): 97-100.
16. Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S. Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of epinephrine concentrations (1:80000 and 1:200000) in 2% lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Int Endod J 2014; 47(4): 373-9
17. Shafaifard S, Khan R. The use of lidocaine and prilocaine in dental surgery. A review. Arch Anesth Critic Care 2020; 2(2): 197-9.
18. Ezmek B, Arslan A, Delilbasi C, Sencift K. Comparison of hemodynamic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine solutions without vasoconstrictor in hypertensive patients. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18(4): 354-9.
19. Bayat M, Zaeri F, Sadatnia F. Comparison of O2 saturation, heart and respiratory rate following injection of vasoconstrictor containing anesthetic (lidocaine 2%) and without vasoconstrictor anesthetic (Mepivacaine) [in Persian]. J Dent Med 2015; 18(3): 45-50.
20. Jalalian Hashemi SH, Ladez SR, Ansari Moghadam S. Comparative assessment of the effects of three local anesthetics: lidocaine, prilocaine, and mepivacaine on blood pressure changes in patients with controlled hypertension. Glob J Health Sci 2016; 8(10): 54157.
21. Torres-Lagares D, Serra Figallo MA, Machuca-Portillo G, Corluera Flores G. Cardiovascular effect of dental anesthesia with articaine (40mg with epinephrine 1mg%) versus mepivacaine (30 mg%) in medically compromised cardiac patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17(4): e655-60.
22. Khalighi Sigaroodi A, Hosseini H, Bashardoust N. Hemodynamic Charactristics Comparing 2% Lidocaine with Epinephrine and Citanest 3% with Felypressin in Lower Third Molar Surgery.
J Dentomaxillofac 2018; 6(4): 129-34.
Journal of Isfahan Dental School
Volume 18, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
December 2021
Pages 330-337