Evaluation of Educational Environment of Ardabil Dental School Based on DSLES Model

Document Type : مقاله‌های پژوهشی

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

4 Dental Student, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the educational environment of the School of Dentistry from the perspective of Ardabil dental students based on the DSLES model.
Materials and Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 197 pre-clinical and clinical students participated who studied in Ardabil Dentistry School in 2022. A 48-item DSLES questionnaire was used to collect data. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and T-test.
Results: The results of the analysis of 7 components of the educational environment based on the DSLES questionnaire showed the results as followings: the mean and standard deviation of student-student (2.18 ± 0.50), the organization of the educational program (2.16 ± 0.49), meaningful experience (1.81 ± 0.46), supportiveness (1.70 ± 0.49), breadth-interest (1.66 ± 0.47), flexibility (1.61 ± 0.43) and emotional climate (1.54 ± 0.41). Also, the mean and standard deviation in the whole questionnaire (educational environment) were estimated to be (1.82 ± 0.30). The results also showed that there is no significant difference in the educational environment of Ardabil Dental School from the perspective of Ardabil dentistry students based on gender (p value > 0.05); But there was a significant difference based on pre-clinic and clinic training course (p value < 0.05).
Conclusion: Based on the results, it is suggested that more attention should be paid to flexibility in the content of the curriculum and also to more communication channels between students and faculty officials to respond to their concerns.
Keywords: Dental education; Environment; Curriculum.

1. Quick KK. A humanistic environment for dental schools: what are dental students experiencing? J Dent Educ 2014; 78(12): 1629-35.
2. Bakhshialiabad H, Bakhshi M, Hassanshahi G. Students’ perceptions of the academic learning environment in seven medical sciences courses based on DREEM. Adv Med Educ Pract 2015; 6(23): 195-203.
3. Eslamipour F, Shirban F, Refaei P. Assessment of dental students' satisfaction of clinical departments in Isfahan dental school [in Persian]. Iran J Med Sci 2011; 10(5): 625-33.
4. Nematollahi H, Razeei L, Khanmohammadi R, Shakib H. Evaluating success of pediatric dentistry department at Mashhad dental school in clinical skills education from student's perspective [in Persian]. J Mashhad Dent 2013; 37(3): 185-200.
5. Henzi D, Davis E, Jasinevicius R, Hendricson W, Cintron L, Isaacs M. Appraisal of the dental school learning environment: the students’ view. J Dent Educ 2005; 69(10): 1137-47.
6. Mojtahedzadeh F, Yassini E, Rahmani N. Reliability and validity of the persian version of dental student learning education questionnaire and a researcher made questionnaire about in-terest of dental students in their field of study. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran 2015; 27(1): 24-30.
7. Wasson LT, Cusmano A, Meli L, Louh I, Falzon L, Hampsey M, et al. Association between learning environment interventions and medical student well-being: a systematic review. JAMA 2016; 316(21): 2237-52.
8. Cho KK, Marjadi B, Langendyk V, Hu W. The self-regulated learning of medical students in the clinical environment - a scoping review. BMC Med Educ 2017; 17(1): 112-8.
9. Phadke A, Kharche J, Vaidya S. Assessment of medical students’ perception of educational environment. Int J Physiol 2020; 8(1): 5-8.
10. Mushtaq R, Ansar A, Bibi A, Ramzan M, Munir A, Zaheer A, et al. Quality of educational environment at Wah Medical College: assessment by using dundee ready educational environment measure. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2017; 29(3): 441-4.
11. Hajihosseini F, Hosseini M, Baghestani A. Educational climate measurement tools in medical sciences universities: a review article [in Persian]. Iran J Med Sci 2015; 15(52): 427-37.
12. Tahani B, Rasaei P. Students’ perspectives in pre-clinical and during the clinical courses in Dental School of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in year 2016 [in Persian]. Iran J Med Sci 2019; 19(15): 136-45.
13. Batra M, Ivanišević Malčić A, Shah AF, Sagtani RA, Medvedec Mikić I, Tariba Knežević P, et al. Self assessment of dental students’ perception of learning environment in Croatia, India and Nepal. Acta Stomatol Croat 2018; 52(4): 275-85.
14. Smith W, Sa B. Students' perspectives on the educational environment in a caribbean dental school during pre-clinical years. International J Soc Sci & Education 2014; 4(2): 457-64.
15. Jain L, Jain M, Mathur A, Paiwal K, Duraiswamy P, Kulkarni S. Perceptions of dental students towards learning environment in an Indian scenario. J Dent Res 2010; 7(2): 56-63.
16. Divaris K, Barlow PJ, Chendea SA, Cheong WS, Dounis A, Dragan IF, et al. The academic environment: the students’ perspective. Eur J Dent Educ 2008; 12(1): 120-30.
17. Kelsey III WP, Kimmes NS, Williams DE, Ogunleye AO, Ault JT, Barkmeier WW. Gender‐based differences in satisfaction with academic preparation and practice experiences. J Dent Educ 2009; 73(4): 464-70.