Evaluation of Attitude and Performance of Iranian Pediatric Dentists in Using Rotary Files in Pulpectomy of Primary Teeth

Document Type : مقاله‌های پژوهشی

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Dental Research Center, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Dental Research Center, Department of Endodontics, Dental Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Dental student, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

10.48305/jids.v21.i1.0067

Abstract

Introduction: The most important goal behind preparing root canal is to clean the root canal. Using rotary instruments facilitate the preparation of root canal, and also it helps a better cleaning of the canal. The present study aimed to evaluate the attitude and performance of pediatric dentists about using rotary files in primary dental pulpectomy in Iran.
Methods and Materials: The present study is a cross-sectional and descriptive study conducted in 150 Iranian pediatric dentists in 2020. The questionnaires were completed by 148 dentists. The demographic data and the practice and attitude of Iranian pediatric dentists to using rotary files in the pulpectomy of primary teeth were collected. Data were analyzed using Chi-square test with significant level less than 0.05.
Results:In the present study 45.6% of the participants used rotary files. While 55.8% of dentists reported that the most important advantage of rotary files compared to manual files is the reduction of working time, 62.2% of dentists reported that the most significant disadvantage of using rotary files compared to manual files in deciduous teeth is the high price of rotary files and necessary equipment. In this study 85% of the dentists reported using rotary files for both E and D deciduous teeth.
Conclusion: Overall, based on the findings of the present study, the total prevalence of using rotary files in the pulpectomy of primary teeth among Iranian pediatric dentists is 45.6%.
Keywords: Attitude; Performance; Pediatric dentistry; Pulpectomy.

References

1. Smaïl-Faugeron V, Courson F, Durieux P, Muller-Bolla M, Glenny AM, Chabouis HF. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (8): CD003220.
2. Parisay I, Ghoddusi J, Forghani M. A review on vital pulp therapy in primary teeth. Iran Endod J 2015; 10(1): 6-15.
3. Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L. Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2018; 19(4): 273-8.
4. George S, Anandaraj S, Issac JS, John SA, Harris A. Rotary endodontics in primary teeth-A review. Saudi Dent J 2016; 28(1): 12-7.
5. Shen S, Deng M, Wang P, Chen X, Zheng L, Li H. Deformation and fracture of K3 rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. Int Endod J 2016; 49(11): 1088-94.
6. Schäfer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. J Endod 2004; 30(6): 432-5.
7. Mehta DN, Dave BH, Bargale SS, Poonacha K, Mulchandani V, Thomas PS. Knowledge, attitude, and practice among pediatric dentists regarding the use of rotary endodontic instruments for endodontic treatment in India. Indian J Dent Res 2017; 3(1): 23-6.
8. Crespo S, Cortes O, Garcia C, Perez L. Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008; 32(4): 295-8.
9. Mozayeni MA, Golshah A, Kerdar NN. A survey on NiTi rotary instruments usage by endodontists and general dentist in Tehran. Iran Endod J 2011; 6(4): 168-75.
10. Parashos P, Messer HH. Questionnaire survey on the use of rotary nickel–titanium endodontic instruments by Australian dentists. Int Endod J 2004; 37(4): 249-59.
11. Aminozarbian M, Razavian H, Razavi A, Nazeri R. Evaluation of knowledge, attitudes and skill of working with rotary files among general dentists in Isfahan, Iran in 2012-2013 [in Persian]. J Isfahan Dent 2013; 9(2): 144-51.
12. Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian E. Knowledge and practice of rotary instrumentation in primary teeth among indian dentists: A questionnaire survey. J Int Oral Health 2017; 9(2): 45-8.
13. Reit C, Bergenholtz G, Caplan D, Molander A. The effect of educational intervention on the adoption of nickel–titanium rotary instrumentation in a Public Dental Service. Int Endod J 2007; 40(4): 268-74.
14. Leonardi DP, Baratto-Filho F, Haragushiku GA, Tomazinho FSF, Lopes MdGK, Moro A. Undergraduates' opinion after 5-year experience with rotary endodontic instruments. Rev Bras Odontol 2011; 8(1): 68-74.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics