Evaluation of the Necessities in Image Projection and CBCT’s Reports of Implant and Mandibular Wisdom Teeth in Selected Oromaxillofacial Radiology Centers in Iran

Document Type : مقاله‌های پژوهشی

Authors

1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Implants Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Post Graduate Student, Dental Student’s research Committee, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: CBCT is essential for accurately implementing many treatment plans. Reports that do not follow a standard can cause errors. This study aimed to investigate the necessity requirements for projection and written reports of CBCT for impacted mandibular wisdom teeth and implants in Iranian maxillofacial radiology centers.
 Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, which was conducted in the spring of 2023 in the Faculty of Dentistry in Isfahan, after preparing the list of CBCT devices, ten centers were selected, and six samples of written and projection reports of implants and mandibular impacted wisdom teeth were collected from each center. The data collection form included 56 variables in written and projection reports of CBCT of wisdom teeth and dental implants. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies and crosstabs were used to investigate the collected data descriptively.
 Results: 60% of implant-written reports were written in variable charts, while 36.7% of wisdom tooth reports were handwritten. The nine variables of written reports of implants and five written reports of wisdom teeth were mentioned in less than 50% of the cases. In the written reports, the variables mentioned in less than 50% of the cases were more than the projection reports.
Conclusion: The projection and written reports of CBCT related to implants and wisdom teeth varied significantly among Iranian oral and maxillofacial radiology centers. In the written reports of implants, fewer necessary variables were mentioned compared to other reports.

Keywords

References

1. Garg V, Bagaria A, Bhat SS, Bhardwaj S, Hedau L. Application of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Dentistry-A Review. J Adv Med Dent Scie Res 2019; 7(4): 73-6.
2. Lindfors N, Lund H, Johansson H, Ekestubbe A. Influence of patient position and other inherent factors on image quality in two different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices. Eur J Radiol Open 2017; 4: 132-7.
3. Abouei E, Lee S, Ford NL. Quantitative performance characterization of image quality and radiation dose for a CS 9300 dental cone beam computed tomography machine. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2015; 2(4): 044002.
4. Al-Ekrish AA, Ekram M. A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40(2): 67-75.
5. Sheikhi M, Karbasi Kheir M, Hekmatian E. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of mental foramen variations: a preliminary study. Radiol Res Pract 2015; 2015: 124635.
6. Hekmatian E, Karbasi Kheir M, Fathollahzade H, Sheikhi M. Detection of vertical root fractures using cone-beam computed tomography in the presence and absence of gutta-percha. ScientificWorldJournal 2018; 2018: 1920946.
7. Mehdizadeh M, Salehi M, Goharian E, Habibollahi A. Evaluation of awareness of general dentists and orthodontists in Isfahan about applications of CBCT in orthodontic therapy [in Persian]. J Isfahan Dent 2019; 15(3): 257-65.
8. Tofangchiha M, Arianfar F, Bakhshi M, Khorasani M. The assessment of dentists’ knowledge regarding indications of cone beam computed tomography in Qazvin, Iran. Biotech Health Sci 2015; 2(1).
9. Mirshafiei Langari F, Johari M, Moudi E, Madani Z. Dental students’ and residents’ knowledge and attitudes towards application of cone-beam computed tomography in Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran [in Persian]. J Mashhad Dent 2020; 44(2): 174-83.
10. Chinna SK, Reddy NP, Thapaswini Y, Muppidi A, Pattepu SV, Sharma P. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice towards Digital Imaging and Cone Beam Computed Tomography among Dental Practitioners in North Karnataka, India. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2021; 13(Suppl 2): S1047-s9.
11. Giray FE, Peker S, Yalcinkaya SE, Kargul B, Aps J. Attitudes and knowledge of paediatric dentists' on digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography. J Pak Med Assoc 2019; 69(2): 205-10.
12. Radiology ESo. Good practice for radiological reporting. Guidelines from the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging 2011; 2(2): 93-6.
13. Pool FJ, Siemienowicz ML. New RANZCR clinical radiology written report guidelines. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019; 63(1): 7-14.
14. Patel S, Harvey S. Guidelines for reporting on CBCT scans. Int Endod J 2021; 54(4): 628-33.
15. Choi J. Dental radiology reporting status and recording frequency of reporting items in Korea. Imaging Sci Dent 2023; 53(1): 35-42.
16. Huettig F, Axmann D. Reporting of dental status from full-arch radiographs: Descriptive analysis and methodological aspects. World J Clin Cases 2014; 2(10): 552-64.
17. Kahn CE Jr., Langlotz CP, Burnside ES, Carrino JA, Channin DS, Hovsepian DM, et al. Toward best practices in radiology reporting. Radiology 2009; 252(3): 852-6.
Journal of Isfahan Dental School
Volume 20, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
October 2024
Pages 196-205

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics