Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Self-Etch Dentin Bonding Agents and Universal Dentin Bonding Agent to Dentin of Primary Teeth
Document Type : مقالههای پژوهشی
Authors
1 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran.
2 Dental Research Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, Dental Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
3 Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
10.48305/v0i0.1541
Abstract
Introduction: Provision of proper bond strength for tooth-colored restorations is very important in the restoration of primary teeth. The aim of this study was to compare shear bond strengths of Clearfil SE two-step self-etch, Palfique one-step self-etch and G-Premio universal bonding agents.
Materials & Methods: A total of 45 intact extracted primary canine teeth were collected for the purpose of this in vitro study and randomly divided into three groups (n = 15). The buccal surfaces of the teeth were prepared with 600-grit silicon carbide discs. The adhesive was applied by a micro-brush to the surface of the teeth according to manufacturer’s instructions; Z350XT composite resin was placed using a plastic mold measuring 2 mm in diameter and 2.5 mm in length and then light-cured. Finally, the shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey test, using SPSS 21 (α = 0.05).
Results: The highest shear bond strength was recorded in G-Premio bond with a mean of 20.60 MPa. Clearfil SE Bond ranked the second with a mean of 18.62 MPa. Palfique Bond exhibited the lowest bond strength (14.64 MPa). There was a significant difference between G-Premio Bond and Palfique Bond (p value < 0.001) and between SE Bond and Palfique Bond (p value = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between G-Premio Bond and SE Bond (p value = 0.29).
Conclusion: Since 17 MPa has been proposed as the critical value needed to withstand polymerization shrinkage, both G-Premio Bond and Clear fil SE Bond have adequate strength for use in primary teeth. Palfique Bond exhibited lower bond strength compared to the two other bonding agents inn primary teeth. Due to the fewer steps of G-Premio Bond in the self-etch mode, use of this bonding agent appears to be logical for the restoration of primary teeth.
Key words: Dentin bonding agents, Shear bond strength.
Materials & Methods: A total of 45 intact extracted primary canine teeth were collected for the purpose of this in vitro study and randomly divided into three groups (n = 15). The buccal surfaces of the teeth were prepared with 600-grit silicon carbide discs. The adhesive was applied by a micro-brush to the surface of the teeth according to manufacturer’s instructions; Z350XT composite resin was placed using a plastic mold measuring 2 mm in diameter and 2.5 mm in length and then light-cured. Finally, the shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey test, using SPSS 21 (α = 0.05).
Results: The highest shear bond strength was recorded in G-Premio bond with a mean of 20.60 MPa. Clearfil SE Bond ranked the second with a mean of 18.62 MPa. Palfique Bond exhibited the lowest bond strength (14.64 MPa). There was a significant difference between G-Premio Bond and Palfique Bond (p value < 0.001) and between SE Bond and Palfique Bond (p value = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between G-Premio Bond and SE Bond (p value = 0.29).
Conclusion: Since 17 MPa has been proposed as the critical value needed to withstand polymerization shrinkage, both G-Premio Bond and Clear fil SE Bond have adequate strength for use in primary teeth. Palfique Bond exhibited lower bond strength compared to the two other bonding agents inn primary teeth. Due to the fewer steps of G-Premio Bond in the self-etch mode, use of this bonding agent appears to be logical for the restoration of primary teeth.
Key words: Dentin bonding agents, Shear bond strength.
1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34(6): 849-53.
2. Anusavice KJ. Phillips' science of dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2003.
3. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: Etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 2001; 17(5): 430-44.
4. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001; 17(4): 296-308.
5. Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, Zhang ZY, Zhou LQ, Jiao K, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--Old wine in new bottles? J Dent 2015; 43(5): 525-36.
6. Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosà M, Cadenaro M, et al. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent 2014; 42(5): 603-12.
7. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014; 42(7): 800-7.
8. Mena-Serrano A, Kose C, de Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD, et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013; 25(1): 55-69.
9. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, et al. Self-assembled Nano-layering at the Adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012; 91(4): 376-81.
10. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Kamenoue S, Okihara T, et al. Novel fluoro-carbon functional monomer for dental bonding. J Dent Res 2014; 93(2): 189-94.
11. Sai K, Shimamura Y, Takamizawa T, Tsujimoto A, Imai A, Endo H, et al. Influence of degradation conditions on dentin bonding durability of three universal adhesives. J Dent 2016; 54: 56-61.
12. McDonald and Avery's dentistry for the child and adolescent. 10th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2015. p. 181.
13. Powers J. Testing of dental materials. In: Sakaguchi RL, Powers J. editors. Craig's restorative dental materials. 13th ed. Michigan, MI: Elsevier; 2012. p. 84-104.
14. Mahalaxmi S. Materials used in dentistry. 1th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2013. p. 38-40, 91-3.
15. Munksgaard EC, Irie M, Asmussen E. Dentin-polymer bond promoted by Gluma and various resins. J Dent Res 1985; 64(12): 1409-11.
16. Joseph P, Yadav C, Satheesh K, Rahna R. Comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of sixth, seventh and eight generation bonding agents: an in vitro study. Int Res J Pharm 2013; 4(9): 143-7.
17. Kamble SS, Kandasamy B, Thillaigovindan R, Goyal NK, Talukdar P, Seal M. In vitro comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength of 6(th), 7(th) and 8(th) generation dentin bonding agents. J Int Oral Health 2015; 7(5): 41-3.
18. Nair M, Paul J, Kumar S, Chakravarthy Y, Krishna V, Shivaprasad. Comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of sixth and seventh generation bonding agents: an in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2014; 17(1): 27-30.
19. Yaseen SM, Subba Reddy VV. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of two self-etching adhesives (sixth and seventh generation) on dentin of primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2009; 27(1): 33-8.
20. Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, Kuroboshi M, Hayakawa S, Maruo Y, et al. Functional monomer impurity affects adhesive performance. Dent Mater 2015; 31(12): 1493-501.
21. Tian FC, Wang XY, Huang Q, Niu LN, Mitchell J, Zhang ZY, et al. Effect of nanolayering of calcium salts of phosphoric acid ester monomers on the durability of resin-dentin bonds. Acta Biomater 2016; 38: 190-200.
22. Iwai H, Nishiyama N. Effect of calcium salt of functional monomer on bonding performance. J Dent Res 2012; 91(11): 1043-8.
23. Bradna P, Vrbova R, Dudek M, Roubickova A, Housova D. Comparison of bonding performance of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesives on human dentin using reliability analysis. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10(6):423-9.
24. Suyama Y, Lührs AK, de Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A, Yamada T, et al. Potential smear layer interference with bonding of self-etching adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2013; 15(4): 317-24.
25. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Watanabe H, Johnson WW, Latta MA, et al. Comparison between universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives in terms of dentin bond fatigue durability in self-etch mode. Eur J Oral Sci 2017; 125(3): 215-222.
26. Uekusa S, Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki M, Tsubota K, Kurokawa H, Hosoya Y. Bonding efficacy of single step self-etch systems to sound primary and permanent tooth dentin. Oper Dent 2006; 31(5): 569-74.
)