مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی اصفهان
مروری بر پیچیدگی‌های درمان لمینت‌های سرامیکی
نوع مقاله : مقاله‌های مروری
چکیده
مقدمه: درمان با لمینت ونیرهای سرامیکی (Porcelain laminate veneers) PLV نرخ موفقیت و بقای بالایی دارد اما این موفقیت و بقا تحت تأثیر برخی پیچیدگی‌ها به خطر می‌افتد. هدف از این مطالعه، بررسی این پیچیدگی‌ها و عوامل مؤثر بر آن‌ها بود.
شرح مقاله: ترک و دباند شدن به ترتیب شایع‌ترین پیچیدگی‌های درمان PLV هستند. پوسیدگی‌های ثانویه، مشکلات اندودونتیک، تغییر رنگ لبه‌ها و تغییر رنگ ونیر از دیگر پیچیدگی‌های این درمان هستند.
نتیجه‌گیری: فاکتورهای متعددی از جمله عادات پارافانکشنال و براکسیسم، تکنیک آماده‌سازی و یا سمنتیشن نامناسب، تطابق لبه‌ای نامناسب ونیر و استفاده از مواد نامناسب بر بروز پیچیدگی‌های این درمان مؤثر هستند و با مدیریت آن‌ها می‌توان بقا و موفقیت درمان PLV را ارتقا داد.
کلید واژه‌ها: ونیرهای دندانی؛ لمینت دندانی؛ پرسیلن دندانی
عنوان مقاله [English]
A Review of Complications of Porcelain Laminate Veneer Treatment
چکیده [English]
Introduction: Treatment with Porcelain laminate veneers (PLV) has a high success and survival rate, but some complications endanger this success and survival. This study aims to investigate these complications and their contributory factors.
Description: Fracture and debonding, respectively, are the most common PLV treatment complications. Secondary caries, endodontic problems, marginal discoloration, and veneer discoloration are other complications of this treatment.
Conclusion: Several factors such as parafunctional activities and bruxism, inadequate preparation technique, inadequate cementation technique, inadequate veneer marginal fitness, and using improper material are contributory to this treatment’s complications, and survival and success of PLV treatment can be improved by managing them.
Keywords: Dental veneers; Dental laminate; Dental porcelain
1. Alghazzawi TF. Clinical Survival Rate and Laboratory Failure of Dental Veneers: A Narrative Literature Review. J Funct Biomater 2024; 15(5): 131.
2. Villalobos-Tinoco J, Jurado CA, Afrashtehfar KI, Fischer N. Combination of minimal-and non-preparation techniques with ceramic veneers for managing esthetic deficiencies. Int J Esthet Dent 2023; 18(3): 232-43.
3. Sailo JL, Bathla N, Thakur P, Nagpal A, Gupta R, Duvedi K. Porcelain veneers vs composite resin veneers: A review. J Adv Med Med Res 2020; 32(24): 316–26.
4. Duran Ojeda G, Bresser RA, Wendler M, Gresnigt MMM. Ceramic partial laminate veneers in anterior teeth: A literature review. J Prosthodont Res 2024; 68(2): 246–54.
5. Assaf A, Azer S, Sfeir A, Al-Haj Husain N, Özcan M. Risk factors with porcelain laminate veneers experienced during cementation: A review. Materials (Basel) 2023; 16(14): 4932.
6. Hanoon ZA, Abdullah HA, Al-Ibraheemi ZA, Alamoush RA, Sami SM, Haider J. Marginal fit of porcelain laminate veneer materials under thermocycling condition: an in-vitro study. Dent J (Basel) 2023; 11(1): 12.
7. Haralur SB. Microleakage of porcelain laminate veneers cemented with different bonding techniques. J Clin Exp Dent 2018; 10(2): e166–71.
8. Alenezi A, Alsweed M, Alsidrani S, Chrcanovic BR. Long-term survival and complication rates of porcelain laminate veneers in clinical studies: a systematic review. J Clin Med 2021; 10(5): 1074.
9. Çötert I, Cotert H. Survival of partial laminate veneers and categorical covariates affecting the survival: a systematic review. Open Dent J 2023; 17.
10. Chai SY, Bennani V, Aarts JM, Lyons K. Incisal preparation design for ceramic veneers: A critical review. J Am Dent Assoc 1939 2018; 149(1): 25-37.
11. Blunck U, Fischer S, Hajto J, Frei S, Frankenberger R. Ceramic laminate veneers: effect of preparation design and ceramic thickness on fracture resistance and marginal quality in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 2020; 24(8): 2745–54.
12. Mert Eren M, Celebi AT, İçer E, Baykasoğlu C, Mugan A, Yücel T, et al. Biomechanical behavior evaluation of resin cement with different elastic modulus on porcelain laminate veneer restorations using micro-ct-based finite element analysis. Materials 2023; 16(6): 2378.
13. Alqahtani FI. Effect of newly Developed Resin Cements and Thermocycling on the Strength of Porcelain Laminate Veneers. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18(3): 209–13.
14. Aslan YU, Uludamar A, Özkan Y. Clinical performance of pressable glass-ceramic veneers after 5, 10, 15, and 20 years: A retrospective case series study. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019; 31(5): 415–22.
15. Komine F, Furuchi M, Honda J, Kubochi K, Takata H. Clinical performance of laminate veneers: A review of the literature. J Prosthodont Res 2024; 68(3): 368-79.
16. Zarow M, Hardan L, Szczeklik K, Bourgi R, Cuevas-Suarez CE, Jakubowicz N, et al. Porcelain Veneers in Vital vs. Non-Vital Teeth: A Retrospective Clinical Evaluation. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10(2): 168.
17. Bicer AZY, Unver S. Etiology of secondary caries in prosthodontic treatments. In: Akarslan Z. editor. Dental Caries - Diagnosis, Prevention and Management. Norderstedt, Germany: BoD – Books on Demand; 2018.
18. Gresnigt MMM, Cune MS, Schuitemaker J, van der Made SAM, Meisberger EW, Magne P, et al. Performance of ceramic laminate veneers with immediate dentine sealing: An 11 year prospective clinical trial. Dent Mater 2019; 35(7): 1042–52.
19. Şencan BB, Yanıkoğlu ND. Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations. Curr Res Dent Sci 2023; 33(1): 58–65.
20. Ojeda D, Naves LZ, Oosterhaven A, Kleinsman R, Bäumer-König A, Körner G, et al. 8-year multicenter retrospective study on partial laminate veneers J Prosthodont Res 2023; 67(2): 206-13.
21. Tuncdemir MT, Gulbahce N, Aykent F. Comparison of color stability of two laminate veneers cemented to tooth surfaces with and without preparation. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020; 32(6): 554–9.
22. Pitta J, Romandini P, Cantarella J, Kraljevic I, Mojon P, Magne P, et al. Extended porcelain veneers in the maxillary anterior region. A retrospective study with an up to 27-year follow-up. Int J Esthet Dent 2024; 19(1): 46–58.
23. Aslan YU, Uludamar A, Özkan Y. Retrospective analysis of lithium disilicate laminate veneers applied by experienced dentists: 10-year results. Int J Prosthodont 2019; 32(6): 471–4.
24. Ferrando Cascales Á, Sauro S, Hirata R, Astudillo-Rubio D, Ferrando Cascales R, Agustin-Panadero R, et al. Total Rehabilitation Using Adhesive Dental Restorations in Patients with Severe Tooth Wear: A 5-Year Retrospective Case Series Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12(16): 5222.
25. Demirekin Z, Turkaslan S. Laminate veneer ceramics in aesthetic rehabilitation of teeth with fluorosis: a 10-year follow-up study. BMC Oral Health 2022; 22(1): 42.
26. Passos Rocha E, Bruniera Anchieta R, Alexandre da Cunha Melo R, Henrique Dos Santos P, Gonçalves Assunção W, Isquierdo de Souza F, et al. Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive ceramic restorations executed by dentists with different levels of experience. Blind and prospective clinical study. J Prosthodont Res 2021; 65(2): 191–7.
27. Liu M, Gai K, Chen J, Jiang L. Comparison of failure and complication risks of porcelain laminate and indirect resin veneer restorations: a meta-analysis. Int J Prosthodont 2019; 32(1): 59–65.
28. Bondzinskaitė R, Venskutė G, Kriaučiūnas A. Fracture resistance of various laminate veneer materials: systematic literature review. Prosthodontics 2021; 71(4): 307–22.
29. Mohammed AJ, Dawood AE, Saeed MA. The effect of adding nanoparticles to dental porcelain on the fracture resistance and bond strength to zirconia core. Indian J Dent Res 2022; 33(2): 193–7.
30. Smielak B, Armata O, Bojar W. A prospective comparative analysis of the survival rates of conventional vs no-prep/minimally invasive veneers over a mean period of 9 years. Clin Oral Investig 2022; 26(3): 3049–59.
31. De angelis F, D’Arcangelo C, Angelozzi R, Vadini M. Retrospective clinical evaluation of a no-prep porcelain veneer protocol. J Prosthet Dent 2021; 129(1): 40-8.
32. Schmitz SM. Survival rate of porcelain veneers versus indirect composite resin veneers in patients with bruxism: a systematic review [Thesis]. Universidad Europea de Madrid; 2023
33. Thaj B, Joseph A, Ramanarayanan V, Singh P, Ravi AB, Krishnan V. Fracture resistance of two preparation designs on anterior laminate veneers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Dent 2022; 13(6): 666–76.
34. Tuğcu E, Vanlıoğlu B, Özkan YK, Aslan YU. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of lithium disilicate laminate veneers on teeth with different preparation depths. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2018; 38(Suppl): s87–s95.
35. Zhang R, Shen L, Xu D, Li X. Analysis of the effects of prepared porcelain veneers and unprepared porcelain veneers on gingival crevicular flora based on high-throughput sequencing. Exp Ther Med 2021; 22(1): 777.
36. Al-Shorman HM, Abu-Naba’a LA, Sghaireen MG, Alam MK. The effect of various preparation and cementation techniques of dental veneers on periodontal status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Dent 2024; 18(2): 458–67.
37. Gaß JA, Büsch C, Körner GA, Bäumer AM. Ceramic anterior veneer restorations in periodontally compromised patients: A retrospective study. Clin Adv Periodontics 2023; 13(4): 266–75.
38. Baig MR, Qasim SSB, Baskaradoss JK. Marginal and internal fit of porcelain laminate veneers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2024; 131(1): 13–24.
39. Badami V, Satya Priya M, Vijay L, Kethineni H, Akarapu S, Agarwal S. Marginal adaptation of veneers: a systematic review. Cureus 2022; 14(11): e31885.
40. Yuce M, Ulusoy M, Turk AG. Comparison of marginal and internal adaptation of heat-pressed and CAD/CAM porcelain laminate veneers and a 2-year follow-up. J Prosthodont 2019; 28(5): 504–10.
41. Alqutaibi AY, Saker S, Alghauli MA, Algabri RS, AbdElaziz MH. Clinical survival and complication rate of ceramic veneers bonded to different substrates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2024.
42. Sadighpour L, Geramipanah F, Rasaei V, Kharazi Fard MJ. Fracture resistance of ceramic laminate veneers bonded to teeth with class v composite fillings after cyclic loading. Int J Dent 2018; 2018: 1456745.
43. Alghauli MA, Alqutaibi AY, Borzangy S. Clinical benefits of immediate dentin sealing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2024.
44. Samimi P, Iranmanesh P, Khoroushi M, Kafi MH, Jafari N. Bond strength evaluation of ceramic restorations with immediate dentin sealing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2023; 25(3): 192-202.
45. Varadan P, Balaji L, Manaswini DY, Rajan RM. Reinforced immediate dentin sealing vs conventional immediate dentin sealing on adhesive behavior of indirect restorations: a systematic review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023; 23(10): 1066–75.
46. Rinke S, Bettenhäuser‐Hartung L, Leha A, Roediger M, Schmalz G, Ziebolz D. Retrospective evaluation of extended glass‐ceramic ceramic laminate veneers after a mean observational period of 10 years. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020; 32(5): 487-95.
47. Lin J, Bennani V, Aarts JM, Brunton P, Ratnayake J. Factors influencing success rate of ceramic veneers on endodontically treated anterior teeth: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2023.
48. Kallala R, Daly M, Gassara Y, Dakhli R, Touzi S, Hadyaoui D, et al. Rationalizing indication of ceramic veneers: a systematic review. EAS J Dent Oral Med 2021; 3: 51–8.
49. Faus-Matoses V, Ruiz-Bell E, Faus-Matoses I, Özcan M, Salvatore S, Faus-Llacer VJ. An 8-year prospective clinical investigation on the survival rate of feldspathic veneers: Influence of occlusal splint in patients with bruxism. J Dent 2020; 99: 103352.
)