بررسی پروسه پذیرش بیمار از بخش بیماری های دهان و فک و صورت تا دریافت خدمات در بخش های مختلف دانشکده دندانپزشکی اصفهان در سال ۱۴۰۰_۱۳۹۹

نوع مقاله : Original Articles

نویسندگان
1 استادیار، گروه بیماری‌های دهان، فک و صورت، مرکز تحقیقات دندانپزشکی، پژوهشکده‌ی علوم دندانپزشکی، دانشکده دندانپزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه جامعه‌نگر، مرکز تحقیقات دندانپزشکی، پژوهشکده علوم دندانپزشکی، دانشکده‌ی دندانپزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
3 دستیار تخصصی دندانپزشکی کودکان، گروه دندانپزشکی کودکان، دانشکده‌ی دندانپزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان، اصفهان ایران
4 دانشجوی دکترای حرفه‌ای دندان‌پزشکی، کمیته پژوهش‌های دانشجویی، دانشکده‌ی دندانپزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
چکیده
مقدمه: دانشکده‌ها با توجه به استفاده‌ی بهینه از امکانات و تجهیزات باید بتوانند در پاسخ به نیازهای بهداشتی- درمانی جامعه گام بردارند. مطالعه با هدف بررسی بیماریابی از بخش بیماری‌های دهان تا دریافت خدمات در بخش‌های مختلف دانشکده‌ی دندانپزشکی اصفهان انجام شد.
مواد و روش‌ها: مطالعه، توصیفی- تحلیلی بوده و بیماران با سرشماری در دانشکده‌ی دندانزشکی در سال 1400-1399 انتخاب شدند. اطلاعات پرونده‌ها شامل اطلاعات دموگرافیک، شکایت اصلی و نیازهای درمانی بر اساس اطلاعات ثبت شده و با استفاده از سامانه‌ی ثبت اطلاعات خدمات ارائه شده بدست آمد. از آنالیز توصیفی و Chi-square باسطح معنی داری 0/05 درصد استفاده شد.
یافتهها: تعداد 742 پرونده بررسی شد. میانگین سنی بیماران 9/33 سال بود. در گروه سنی زیر 18 سال بیشترین علت مراجعه معاینه 4/47 درصد (37 نفر)، 35-18 سال درد 42 درصد (137 نفر)، 60-36 سال ترمیم دندان‌ها 39 درصد (123 نفر)، بالای 60 سال درد و معاینه 34/8 درصد (8 نفر) بوده است. در رابطه بین سن و نیازهای تشخیص داده بیشترین نیاز به درمان ریشه در گروه سنی 35-18 سال بود.
نتیجهگیری: بیشترین دلیل مراجعه درد دندان، بیشترین نیاز درمانی ترمیم بود. اکثریت افرادی که به نیازهای درمانی‌شان پاسخ داده شده در گروه سنی زیر 18 سال و اکثریت افرادی که پاسخ داده نشده در گروه سنی بالای 60 سال بودند. ۱۵ درصد خدمات مورد نیاز را کامل، ۶۰ درصد بخشی از نیازها و ۲۵ درصد هیچ کدام از نیازها پاسخ داده نشده است.

تازه های تحقیق

فاطمه عباسی : Google Scholar

بهاره طحانی: Google Scholar

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of the Patient Admission Process from the Department of Oral Medicin to Receiving Services in Various Departments of Isfahan Dental School

نویسندگان English

Fatemeh Abbasi 1
Bahareh Tahani 2
Razieh Jahadakbar 3
Fatemeh Nadafi 4
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine Dental Research center, Dental Research institute, school of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Associated Professor, Department of Oral Public Health, Dental Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Post Graduate Student, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4 Dental Student, Dental Research Center, Dental Research institute, Sschool of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: Dental schools, by making optimal use of their facilities and resources, should be able to address the health and treatment needs of the community. This study aimed to investigate the case-finding and referral pathway from the Department of Oral Medicine to receiving services in various departments of the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry.
Materials and Methods : This descriptive-analytical study included all patients through a census method at the School of Dentistry during 2020–2021. Data from patient records, including demographic information, chief complaint, and treatment needs, were extracted from documented records and the electronic service registration system. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square test were applied with a significance level of 0.05.

Results: A total of 742 records were reviewed. The mean age of patients was 33.9 years. The most common reason for referral was examination in patients under 18 years (47.4%, n = 37), pain in the 18–35 age group (42%, n = 137), tooth restoration in the 36–60 group (39%, n = 123), and pain or examination in patients over 60 years (34.8%, n = 8). The highest demand for root canal treatment was observed in the 18–35 age group.

Conclusion: The most common reason for referral was dental pain, while the most frequent treatment need was restorative care. Most patients whose treatment needs were met belonged to the under-18 age group, whereas the majority of unmet needs were seen in patients over 60 years old. Overall, 15% of treatment needs were fully addressed, 60% were partially met, and 25% remained completely unmet.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Patient
Treatment
Care
Dental School
1.      Kiyak HA. Age and culture: influences on oral health behaviour. Int Dent J 1993; 43(1): 9-16.
2.      Birant S, Koruyucu M, Ozcan H, Ilisulu C, Kasimoglu Y, Ustun N, et al. Investigating the level of knowledge of the community about oral and dental health. Eur J Dent 2021; 15(01):1 45-51.
3.      Walji MF, Karimbux NY, Spielman AI. Person‐centered care: opportunities and challenges for academic dental institutions and programs. J Dent Educ 2017; 81(11): 1265-72.
4.      Bastani P, Mohammadpour M, Mehraliain G, Delavari S, Edirippulige S. What makes inequality in the area of dental and oral health in developing countries? A scoping review. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2021; 19(1): 54.
5.      Bahannan SA, Eltelety SM, Hassan MH, Ibrahim SS, Amer HA, El Meligy OA et al, Oral and dental health status among adolescents with limited access to dental care services in Jeddah. Dent J (Basel) 2018; 6(2): 15.
6.      Chandel T, Alulaiyan M, Farraj M, Riedy CA, Barrow JR, Brennan L, et al. Training and educational programs that support geriatric dental care in rural settings: A scoping review. J Dent Educ 2022; 7(5): 347-52.
7.      Elani HW, Simon L, Ticku S, Bain PA, Barrow J, Riedy CA. Does providing dental services reduce overall health care costs?: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Dent Assoc 2018; 149(8): 696-703.
8.      Graham BS, Knight GW, Graham L. Dental student academic integrity in US dental schools: current status and recommendations for enhancement. J Dent Educ 2016; 80(1): 5-13.
9.      Shubayr MA, Kruger E, Tennant M. Access to Dental-Care Services in Jazan, Saudi Arabia: A Scoping Review. Saudi J Health Syst Res 2022; 2(1): 9–19.
10.   Choudhary S, Sen N, Thakker J, Patel D, Joshi R. Assessment of patient satisfaction toward dental care services of patients visiting dental schools in Udaipur, Rajasthan, India. J Oral Care Res 2017; 5(1): 34-41.
11.   Klein SP, Bohannan HM, Bell RM, Disney JA, Foch CB, Graves RC. The cost and effectiveness of school-based preventive dental care. Am J Public Health 1985; 75(4): 382-91.
12.   Chae S, Lee Y, Kim J, Chun KH, Lee JK. Factors associated with perceived unmet dental care needs of older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17(11): 1936-42.
13.   Kim SY, Park J, Ryu SY, Choi SW. Factors of unmet dental care needs among oral health problems and dental care patients. J Health Info Stat 2020; 45(2): 132-8.
14.   Pentapati KC, Siddiq H. Clinical applications of intraoral camera to increase patient compliance-current perspectives. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2019; 11: 267-78.
15.   Sheiham A. Oral health, general health and quality of life. Bull. World Health Organ 2005; 83(9): 644-53.
16.   Carrasco-Labra A, Brignardello-Petersen R, Glick M, Guyatt GH, Neumann I. Azarpazhooh A. A practical approach to evidence-based dentistry: VII: how to use patient management recommendations from clinical practice guidelines. J Am Dent Assoc 2015; 146(5): 327-36.
17.   Righolt AJ, Jevdjevic M, Marcenes W, Listl S. Global-, regional-, and country-level economic impacts of dental diseases. J Dent Res 2018; 97(5): 501-9.
18.   Hakeem NE, Eshwar S, Srivastava BK, Jain V. Micro-health insurance in dentistry: the road less travelled. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health 2016; 56(4): 340-7.
19.   Rezaei S, Pulok MH, Moghadam TZ, Zandian H. Socioeconomic-related inequalities in dental care utilization in northwestern Iran. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2020; 12: 181.
20.   Mason D. General dental practice--challenges and opportunities: A personal view. Br Dent J 1995; 179(9): 350-7.
21.   Hajisadeghi S, Kashani Z. Survey of patient's satisfaction in the faculty of dentistry, Qom university of medical sciences in 2016-2017. Qom Univ. Med. Sci. J. 2018 Oct;12(2):62-73.
22.   Abud MC, Dos Santos JF, Da Cunha VD, Marchini L. TMD and GOHAI indices of Brazilian institutionalised and community‐dwelling elderly. Gerodontology 2009; 26(1): 34-39.
23.   Wijeratne DT, Lajkosz K, Brogly SB, Lougheed MD, Jiang L, Housin A, et al, Increasing incidence and prevalence of World Health Organization groups 1 to 4 pulmonary hypertension: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2018; 11(2): 240-9.
24.   Alonso J, Orfila F, Ruigomez A, Ferrer M, Antó JM. Unmet health care needs and mortality among Spanish elderly. Am J Public Health 1997; 87(3): 365-76.
25.   Lynch CD, Ash PJ, Chadwick BL, Hannigan A. Effect of community‐based clinical teaching programs on student confidence: a view from the United Kingdom. J Dent Edu 2010; 74(5): 510-23.
26.   Plasschaert AJ, Holbrook WP, Delap E, Martinez C, Walmsley AD. Profile and competences for the European dentist. Eur J Dent Educ 2005; 9(3): 98-107.
27.   Lekic PC, Sanche N, Odlum O, de Vries J, Wiltshire WA. Increasing general dentists’ provision of care to child patients through changes in the undergraduate pediatric dentistry program. J Dent Edu 2005; 69(3): 371-82.
28.   Bohaty BS, Spencer P, Haynes JI. Pediatric dental education and community service: a combined approach. ASDC J Dent Child 1992; 59(3): 212-7.
29.   Hand R, Garg M, Dajani KF. Patient mix in the primary ambulatory care clinics of an academic medical center. Acad Med 1993; 68(10): 803-8.